Dual Criteria Decisions

Steffen Andersen, Glenn W. Harrison, Morten I. Lau, E. Elisabet Rutström

Publikation: Working paperForskning

2 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

The most popular models of decision making use a single criteria to evaluate projects or lotteries. However, decision makers may actually consider multiple criteria when evaluating projects. We consider a dual criteria model from psychology. This model integrates the familiar tradeoffs between risk and utility that economists traditionally assume, allowance for rank-dependent decision weights, and consideration of income thresholds. We examine the issues involved in full maximum likelihood estimation of the model using observed choice data. We propose a general method for integrating the multiple criteria, using the logic of mixture models, which we believe is attractive from a decision-theoretic and statistical perspective. The model is applied to observed choices from a major natural experiment involving intrinsically dynamic choices over highly skewed outcomes. The evidence points to the clear role that income thresholds play in such decision making, but does not rule out a role for tradeoffs between risk and utility or probability weighting.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedFrederiksberg
UdgiverDepartment of Economics. Copenhagen Business School
Antal sider32
StatusUdgivet - 2009
NavnWorking Paper / Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School
Nummer2-2009

Citer dette

Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Dual Criteria Decisions. Frederiksberg: Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School. Working Paper / Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School, Nr. 2-2009
Andersen, Steffen ; Harrison, Glenn W. ; Lau, Morten I. ; Rutström, E. Elisabet. / Dual Criteria Decisions. Frederiksberg : Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School, 2009. (Working Paper / Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School; Nr. 2-2009).
@techreport{530a93b0fb6e11deae57000ea68e967b,
title = "Dual Criteria Decisions",
abstract = "The most popular models of decision making use a single criteria to evaluate projects or lotteries. However, decision makers may actually consider multiple criteria when evaluating projects. We consider a dual criteria model from psychology. This model integrates the familiar tradeoffs between risk and utility that economists traditionally assume, allowance for rank-dependent decision weights, and consideration of income thresholds. We examine the issues involved in full maximum likelihood estimation of the model using observed choice data. We propose a general method for integrating the multiple criteria, using the logic of mixture models, which we believe is attractive from a decision-theoretic and statistical perspective. The model is applied to observed choices from a major natural experiment involving intrinsically dynamic choices over highly skewed outcomes. The evidence points to the clear role that income thresholds play in such decision making, but does not rule out a role for tradeoffs between risk and utility or probability weighting.",
author = "Steffen Andersen and Harrison, {Glenn W.} and Lau, {Morten I.} and Rutstr{\"o}m, {E. Elisabet}",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
series = "Working Paper / Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School",
publisher = "Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School",
number = "2-2009",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School",

}

Andersen, S, Harrison, GW, Lau, MI & Rutström, EE 2009 'Dual Criteria Decisions' Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg.

Dual Criteria Decisions. / Andersen, Steffen; Harrison, Glenn W.; Lau, Morten I.; Rutström, E. Elisabet.

Frederiksberg : Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School, 2009.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - Dual Criteria Decisions

AU - Andersen, Steffen

AU - Harrison, Glenn W.

AU - Lau, Morten I.

AU - Rutström, E. Elisabet

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The most popular models of decision making use a single criteria to evaluate projects or lotteries. However, decision makers may actually consider multiple criteria when evaluating projects. We consider a dual criteria model from psychology. This model integrates the familiar tradeoffs between risk and utility that economists traditionally assume, allowance for rank-dependent decision weights, and consideration of income thresholds. We examine the issues involved in full maximum likelihood estimation of the model using observed choice data. We propose a general method for integrating the multiple criteria, using the logic of mixture models, which we believe is attractive from a decision-theoretic and statistical perspective. The model is applied to observed choices from a major natural experiment involving intrinsically dynamic choices over highly skewed outcomes. The evidence points to the clear role that income thresholds play in such decision making, but does not rule out a role for tradeoffs between risk and utility or probability weighting.

AB - The most popular models of decision making use a single criteria to evaluate projects or lotteries. However, decision makers may actually consider multiple criteria when evaluating projects. We consider a dual criteria model from psychology. This model integrates the familiar tradeoffs between risk and utility that economists traditionally assume, allowance for rank-dependent decision weights, and consideration of income thresholds. We examine the issues involved in full maximum likelihood estimation of the model using observed choice data. We propose a general method for integrating the multiple criteria, using the logic of mixture models, which we believe is attractive from a decision-theoretic and statistical perspective. The model is applied to observed choices from a major natural experiment involving intrinsically dynamic choices over highly skewed outcomes. The evidence points to the clear role that income thresholds play in such decision making, but does not rule out a role for tradeoffs between risk and utility or probability weighting.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Working Paper / Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School

BT - Dual Criteria Decisions

PB - Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School

CY - Frederiksberg

ER -

Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE. Dual Criteria Decisions. Frederiksberg: Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School. 2009.