Disordered Gambling Prevalence: Methodological Innovations in a General Danish Population Survey

Glenn W. Harrison, Lasse J. Jessen, Morten Lau, Don Ross

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

49 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

We study Danish adult gambling behavior with an emphasis on discovering patterns relevant to public health forecasting and economic welfare assessment of policy. Methodological innovations include measurement of formative in addition to reflective constructs, estimation of prospective risk for developing gambling disorder rather than risk of being falsely negatively diagnosed, analysis with attention to sample weights and correction for sample selection bias, estimation of the impact of trigger questions on prevalence estimates and sample characteristics, and distinguishing between total and marginal effects of risk-indicating factors. The most significant novelty in our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a 'trigger' or 'gateway' question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prospective risk for disordered gambling. We find that 87.6% of the population is indicated for no detectable risk, 5.4% is indicated for early risk, 1.7% is indicated for intermediate risk, 2.6% is indicated for advanced risk, and 2.6% is indicated for disordered gambling. Correcting for sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates. Although these estimates of the 'at risk' fraction of the population are significantly higher than conventionally reported, we infer a significant decrease in overall prevalence rates of detectable risk with these corrections, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Gambling Studies
Vol/bind34
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)225-253
Antal sider29
ISSN1050-5350
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Emneord

  • Denmark
  • DSM criteria
  • FLAGS
  • Formative and reflective constructs
  • Gambling disorder prevalence
  • Prevalence survey methodology

Citer dette

@article{3c0c1f7bbf96425e8a0ff55cbb07386b,
title = "Disordered Gambling Prevalence: Methodological Innovations in a General Danish Population Survey",
abstract = "We study Danish adult gambling behavior with an emphasis on discovering patterns relevant to public health forecasting and economic welfare assessment of policy. Methodological innovations include measurement of formative in addition to reflective constructs, estimation of prospective risk for developing gambling disorder rather than risk of being falsely negatively diagnosed, analysis with attention to sample weights and correction for sample selection bias, estimation of the impact of trigger questions on prevalence estimates and sample characteristics, and distinguishing between total and marginal effects of risk-indicating factors. The most significant novelty in our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a 'trigger' or 'gateway' question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prospective risk for disordered gambling. We find that 87.6{\%} of the population is indicated for no detectable risk, 5.4{\%} is indicated for early risk, 1.7{\%} is indicated for intermediate risk, 2.6{\%} is indicated for advanced risk, and 2.6{\%} is indicated for disordered gambling. Correcting for sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates. Although these estimates of the 'at risk' fraction of the population are significantly higher than conventionally reported, we infer a significant decrease in overall prevalence rates of detectable risk with these corrections, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.",
keywords = "Denmark, DSM criteria, FLAGS, Formative and reflective constructs, Gambling disorder prevalence, Prevalence survey methodology, Denmark, DSM criteria, FLAGS, Formative and reflective constructs, Gambling disorder prevalence, Prevalence survey methodology",
author = "Harrison, {Glenn W.} and Jessen, {Lasse J.} and Morten Lau and Don Ross",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s10899-017-9707-1",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "225--253",
journal = "Journal of Gambling Studies",
issn = "1050-5350",
publisher = "Human Sciences Press",
number = "1",

}

Disordered Gambling Prevalence : Methodological Innovations in a General Danish Population Survey. / Harrison, Glenn W.; Jessen, Lasse J.; Lau, Morten; Ross, Don.

I: Journal of Gambling Studies, Bind 34, Nr. 1, 2018, s. 225-253.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disordered Gambling Prevalence

T2 - Methodological Innovations in a General Danish Population Survey

AU - Harrison, Glenn W.

AU - Jessen, Lasse J.

AU - Lau, Morten

AU - Ross, Don

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - We study Danish adult gambling behavior with an emphasis on discovering patterns relevant to public health forecasting and economic welfare assessment of policy. Methodological innovations include measurement of formative in addition to reflective constructs, estimation of prospective risk for developing gambling disorder rather than risk of being falsely negatively diagnosed, analysis with attention to sample weights and correction for sample selection bias, estimation of the impact of trigger questions on prevalence estimates and sample characteristics, and distinguishing between total and marginal effects of risk-indicating factors. The most significant novelty in our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a 'trigger' or 'gateway' question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prospective risk for disordered gambling. We find that 87.6% of the population is indicated for no detectable risk, 5.4% is indicated for early risk, 1.7% is indicated for intermediate risk, 2.6% is indicated for advanced risk, and 2.6% is indicated for disordered gambling. Correcting for sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates. Although these estimates of the 'at risk' fraction of the population are significantly higher than conventionally reported, we infer a significant decrease in overall prevalence rates of detectable risk with these corrections, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.

AB - We study Danish adult gambling behavior with an emphasis on discovering patterns relevant to public health forecasting and economic welfare assessment of policy. Methodological innovations include measurement of formative in addition to reflective constructs, estimation of prospective risk for developing gambling disorder rather than risk of being falsely negatively diagnosed, analysis with attention to sample weights and correction for sample selection bias, estimation of the impact of trigger questions on prevalence estimates and sample characteristics, and distinguishing between total and marginal effects of risk-indicating factors. The most significant novelty in our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a 'trigger' or 'gateway' question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prospective risk for disordered gambling. We find that 87.6% of the population is indicated for no detectable risk, 5.4% is indicated for early risk, 1.7% is indicated for intermediate risk, 2.6% is indicated for advanced risk, and 2.6% is indicated for disordered gambling. Correcting for sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates. Although these estimates of the 'at risk' fraction of the population are significantly higher than conventionally reported, we infer a significant decrease in overall prevalence rates of detectable risk with these corrections, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.

KW - Denmark

KW - DSM criteria

KW - FLAGS

KW - Formative and reflective constructs

KW - Gambling disorder prevalence

KW - Prevalence survey methodology

KW - Denmark

KW - DSM criteria

KW - FLAGS

KW - Formative and reflective constructs

KW - Gambling disorder prevalence

KW - Prevalence survey methodology

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=960238790422&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1007/s10899-017-9707-1

DO - 10.1007/s10899-017-9707-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 225

EP - 253

JO - Journal of Gambling Studies

JF - Journal of Gambling Studies

SN - 1050-5350

IS - 1

ER -