TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital Transformation and the New Logics of Business Process Management
AU - Baiyere, Abayomi
AU - Salmela, Hannu
AU - Tapanainen, Tommi
N1 - Published online: 1 March 2020
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Business process management (BPM) research emphasises three important logics–modelling (process), infrastructural alignment (infrastructure) and procedural actor (agency) logics. These logics capture the dominant ways of thinking in BPM, reflected in its assumptions, practices and values. While the three logics have proven useful in prior contexts, we argue that the applicability of these underlying assumptions in theorising BPM needs to be re-examined in the context of digital transformation. Based on an ethnographic study of BPM in a company undergoing digital transformation, we uncover tensions related to applying these prior logics that point to the need to update the underlying assumptions. Consequently, we propose new logics that we conceptualise as light touch processes (process), infrastructural flexibility (infrastructure) and mindful actors (agency). Our observations contribute to a rethinking of the dominant BPM logics by unpacking their dynamics in the context of digital transformation. Our study further highlight salient differences between digital transformation and IT-enabled organisational transformation contexts. We conclude by proposing new managerial approaches for BPM in digital transformation contexts.
AB - Business process management (BPM) research emphasises three important logics–modelling (process), infrastructural alignment (infrastructure) and procedural actor (agency) logics. These logics capture the dominant ways of thinking in BPM, reflected in its assumptions, practices and values. While the three logics have proven useful in prior contexts, we argue that the applicability of these underlying assumptions in theorising BPM needs to be re-examined in the context of digital transformation. Based on an ethnographic study of BPM in a company undergoing digital transformation, we uncover tensions related to applying these prior logics that point to the need to update the underlying assumptions. Consequently, we propose new logics that we conceptualise as light touch processes (process), infrastructural flexibility (infrastructure) and mindful actors (agency). Our observations contribute to a rethinking of the dominant BPM logics by unpacking their dynamics in the context of digital transformation. Our study further highlight salient differences between digital transformation and IT-enabled organisational transformation contexts. We conclude by proposing new managerial approaches for BPM in digital transformation contexts.
KW - Business Process Management
KW - Digital Transformation
KW - Infrastructural flexibility
KW - IT-enabled organisational transformation
KW - Jan Mendling, Brian T. Pentland and Jan Recker
KW - Light touch process
KW - Logics
KW - Mindfulness
KW - Organisational change
KW - Digital transformation
KW - Business process management
KW - Organisational change
KW - Mindfulness
KW - Infrastructural flexibility
KW - Light touch process
KW - IT-enabled organisational transformation
KW - Logics
U2 - 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
DO - 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85081004870
SN - 0960-085X
VL - 29
SP - 238
EP - 259
JO - European Journal of Information Systems
JF - European Journal of Information Systems
IS - 3
ER -