Developing Supply Chains in Disaster Relief Operations through Cross‐Sector Socially Oriented Collaborations

A Theoretical Model

François Maon, Adam Lindgreen, Joelle Vanhamme

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose
– This study seeks to provide insights into corporate achievements in supply chain management (SCM) and logistics management and to detail how they might help disaster agencies. The authors aim to highlight and identify current practices, particularities, and challenges in disaster relief supply chains.

Design/methodology/approach
– Both SCM and logistics management literature and examples drawn from real‐life cases inform the development of the theoretical model.

Findings
– The theoretical, dual‐cycle model that focuses on the key missions of disaster relief agencies: first, prevention and planning and, second, response and recovery. Three major contributions are offered: a concise representation of current practices and particularities of disaster relief supply chains compared with commercial SCM; challenges and barriers to the development of more efficient SCM practices, classified into learning, strategising, and coordinating and measurement issues; and a simple, functional model for understanding how collaborations between corporations and disaster relief agencies might help relief agencies meet SCM challenges.

Research limitations/implications
– The study does not address culture‐clash related considerations. Rather than representing the entire scope of real‐life situations and practices, the analysis relies on key assumptions to help conceptualise collaborative paths.

Practical implications
– The study provides specific insights into how corporations might help improve the SCM practices by disaster relief agencies that continue to function without SCM professional expertise, tools, or staff.

Originality/value
– The paper shows that sharing supply chain and logistics expertise, technology, and infrastructure with relief agencies could be a way for corporations to demonstrate their good corporate citizenship. Collaborations between corporations and disaster agencies offer significant potential benefits.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSupply Chain Management: An International Journal
Vol/bind14
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)149-164
ISSN1359-8546
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2009
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Supply chain management
  • Disasters
  • Corporate social responsibility

Citer dette

@article{858c43fc0e2c4658a4fa514c3d9e6d32,
title = "Developing Supply Chains in Disaster Relief Operations through Cross‐Sector Socially Oriented Collaborations: A Theoretical Model",
abstract = "Purpose – This study seeks to provide insights into corporate achievements in supply chain management (SCM) and logistics management and to detail how they might help disaster agencies. The authors aim to highlight and identify current practices, particularities, and challenges in disaster relief supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – Both SCM and logistics management literature and examples drawn from real‐life cases inform the development of the theoretical model. Findings – The theoretical, dual‐cycle model that focuses on the key missions of disaster relief agencies: first, prevention and planning and, second, response and recovery. Three major contributions are offered: a concise representation of current practices and particularities of disaster relief supply chains compared with commercial SCM; challenges and barriers to the development of more efficient SCM practices, classified into learning, strategising, and coordinating and measurement issues; and a simple, functional model for understanding how collaborations between corporations and disaster relief agencies might help relief agencies meet SCM challenges. Research limitations/implications – The study does not address culture‐clash related considerations. Rather than representing the entire scope of real‐life situations and practices, the analysis relies on key assumptions to help conceptualise collaborative paths. Practical implications – The study provides specific insights into how corporations might help improve the SCM practices by disaster relief agencies that continue to function without SCM professional expertise, tools, or staff. Originality/value – The paper shows that sharing supply chain and logistics expertise, technology, and infrastructure with relief agencies could be a way for corporations to demonstrate their good corporate citizenship. Collaborations between corporations and disaster agencies offer significant potential benefits.",
keywords = "Supply chain management, Disasters, Corporate social responsibility",
author = "Fran{\cc}ois Maon and Adam Lindgreen and Joelle Vanhamme",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/13598540910942019",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "149--164",
journal = "Supply Chain Management: An International Journal",
issn = "1359-8546",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Developing Supply Chains in Disaster Relief Operations through Cross‐Sector Socially Oriented Collaborations : A Theoretical Model. / Maon, François; Lindgreen, Adam; Vanhamme, Joelle.

I: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Bind 14, Nr. 2, 2009, s. 149-164.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing Supply Chains in Disaster Relief Operations through Cross‐Sector Socially Oriented Collaborations

T2 - A Theoretical Model

AU - Maon, François

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

AU - Vanhamme, Joelle

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose – This study seeks to provide insights into corporate achievements in supply chain management (SCM) and logistics management and to detail how they might help disaster agencies. The authors aim to highlight and identify current practices, particularities, and challenges in disaster relief supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – Both SCM and logistics management literature and examples drawn from real‐life cases inform the development of the theoretical model. Findings – The theoretical, dual‐cycle model that focuses on the key missions of disaster relief agencies: first, prevention and planning and, second, response and recovery. Three major contributions are offered: a concise representation of current practices and particularities of disaster relief supply chains compared with commercial SCM; challenges and barriers to the development of more efficient SCM practices, classified into learning, strategising, and coordinating and measurement issues; and a simple, functional model for understanding how collaborations between corporations and disaster relief agencies might help relief agencies meet SCM challenges. Research limitations/implications – The study does not address culture‐clash related considerations. Rather than representing the entire scope of real‐life situations and practices, the analysis relies on key assumptions to help conceptualise collaborative paths. Practical implications – The study provides specific insights into how corporations might help improve the SCM practices by disaster relief agencies that continue to function without SCM professional expertise, tools, or staff. Originality/value – The paper shows that sharing supply chain and logistics expertise, technology, and infrastructure with relief agencies could be a way for corporations to demonstrate their good corporate citizenship. Collaborations between corporations and disaster agencies offer significant potential benefits.

AB - Purpose – This study seeks to provide insights into corporate achievements in supply chain management (SCM) and logistics management and to detail how they might help disaster agencies. The authors aim to highlight and identify current practices, particularities, and challenges in disaster relief supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – Both SCM and logistics management literature and examples drawn from real‐life cases inform the development of the theoretical model. Findings – The theoretical, dual‐cycle model that focuses on the key missions of disaster relief agencies: first, prevention and planning and, second, response and recovery. Three major contributions are offered: a concise representation of current practices and particularities of disaster relief supply chains compared with commercial SCM; challenges and barriers to the development of more efficient SCM practices, classified into learning, strategising, and coordinating and measurement issues; and a simple, functional model for understanding how collaborations between corporations and disaster relief agencies might help relief agencies meet SCM challenges. Research limitations/implications – The study does not address culture‐clash related considerations. Rather than representing the entire scope of real‐life situations and practices, the analysis relies on key assumptions to help conceptualise collaborative paths. Practical implications – The study provides specific insights into how corporations might help improve the SCM practices by disaster relief agencies that continue to function without SCM professional expertise, tools, or staff. Originality/value – The paper shows that sharing supply chain and logistics expertise, technology, and infrastructure with relief agencies could be a way for corporations to demonstrate their good corporate citizenship. Collaborations between corporations and disaster agencies offer significant potential benefits.

KW - Supply chain management

KW - Disasters

KW - Corporate social responsibility

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017776204

U2 - 10.1108/13598540910942019

DO - 10.1108/13598540910942019

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 149

EP - 164

JO - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

JF - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

SN - 1359-8546

IS - 2

ER -