TY - UNPB
T1 - Designing Net Wealth Taxes
T2 - Challenges in Valuating Shares in Unlisted Companies
AU - Skar, Henrik
AU - Traini, Simone
AU - Schmidt, Peter Koerver
AU - Solheim, Erlend Thinn
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This article investigates challenges of valuing unlisted shares for wealth tax purposes in light of the legal principle of equality. Using a dataset of Norwegian companies sold between 2018 and 2021, we assess the accuracy of valuation methods used in Norway, Denmark, and Switzerland by comparing estimated values with sales prices. None of the methods reliably reflect market values, though their shortcomings differ. The Norwegian method, based solely on net asset value, leads to widespread undervaluation. The Danish and Swiss methods attempt to capture goodwill by incorporating historical earnings, resulting in fewer undervaluations but more overvaluation. In countries with constitutional equality principles, such disparities may pose challenges if a wealth tax is introduced. While the Norwegian method may be more defensible in some respects, its failure to account for goodwill remains a key weakness. We consider whether a refined version of the Danish model—with certain adjustments—could offer a more balanced alternative, while acknowledging administrative complexity. Ultimately, our findings underscore the need to address valuation issues if a wealth tax—especially a global one—is to be legally defensible.
AB - This article investigates challenges of valuing unlisted shares for wealth tax purposes in light of the legal principle of equality. Using a dataset of Norwegian companies sold between 2018 and 2021, we assess the accuracy of valuation methods used in Norway, Denmark, and Switzerland by comparing estimated values with sales prices. None of the methods reliably reflect market values, though their shortcomings differ. The Norwegian method, based solely on net asset value, leads to widespread undervaluation. The Danish and Swiss methods attempt to capture goodwill by incorporating historical earnings, resulting in fewer undervaluations but more overvaluation. In countries with constitutional equality principles, such disparities may pose challenges if a wealth tax is introduced. While the Norwegian method may be more defensible in some respects, its failure to account for goodwill remains a key weakness. We consider whether a refined version of the Danish model—with certain adjustments—could offer a more balanced alternative, while acknowledging administrative complexity. Ultimately, our findings underscore the need to address valuation issues if a wealth tax—especially a global one—is to be legally defensible.
M3 - Working paper
T3 - CBT Working Paper Series
BT - Designing Net Wealth Taxes
PB - Oxford University
CY - Oxford
ER -