Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

There is no doubt that spiritual and religious knowledge surrounds all of our cultural worldviews as Habermas argues and the cultural common sense knowing is the background for scientific knowing although a part of it strives to wards a universal a-historicity. This leaves the problem of how to negotiate a common platform that allows for both science and religion to work fruitfully together and at the same time conserve the ability to distinguish between them, which were Peirce’s vision. This is what Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology is about. In focus will have to be the concept of science or, which Deely always underlined, meant Peircean postmodern semiotic pragmaticist realism. Ontologically this meant that the universe is not only self-organizing driven by irreversible thermodynamics’ forming of dissipative structures or objective information organization as cybernetics and general system theory proposes, but by a semiotic grand argument developing a natural proposition from a very general form of feeling. This self-organized abstract semiotic logic based rationality is a normative agapistic movement toward Summon Bonum. Order and rationality is a common good not just between humans and their cultures, but also for their relation to nature’s evolution in this semiotic agapism.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2017
StatusUdgivet - 2017
Begivenhed13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS: CROSS-INTER-MULTI-TRANS - Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Litauen
Varighed: 26 jun. 201730 jun. 2017
Konferencens nummer: 13

Konference

Konference13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS
Nummer13
LokationKaunas University of Technology
LandLitauen
ByKaunas
Periode26/06/201730/06/2017

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Deely
  • Peirce
  • Theology
  • Semiotic ontology

Citer dette

Brier, S. (2017). Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion. Afhandling præsenteret på 13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS, Kaunas, Litauen.
Brier, Søren. / Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion. Afhandling præsenteret på 13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS, Kaunas, Litauen.
@conference{55c900a303c54ed6b741776c4d167947,
title = "Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion",
abstract = "There is no doubt that spiritual and religious knowledge surrounds all of our cultural worldviews as Habermas argues and the cultural common sense knowing is the background for scientific knowing although a part of it strives to wards a universal a-historicity. This leaves the problem of how to negotiate a common platform that allows for both science and religion to work fruitfully together and at the same time conserve the ability to distinguish between them, which were Peirce’s vision. This is what Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology is about. In focus will have to be the concept of science or, which Deely always underlined, meant Peircean postmodern semiotic pragmaticist realism. Ontologically this meant that the universe is not only self-organizing driven by irreversible thermodynamics’ forming of dissipative structures or objective information organization as cybernetics and general system theory proposes, but by a semiotic grand argument developing a natural proposition from a very general form of feeling. This self-organized abstract semiotic logic based rationality is a normative agapistic movement toward Summon Bonum. Order and rationality is a common good not just between humans and their cultures, but also for their relation to nature’s evolution in this semiotic agapism.",
keywords = "Deely, Peirce, Theology, Semiotic ontology, Deely, Peirce, Theology, Semiotic ontology",
author = "S{\o}ren Brier",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 26-06-2017 Through 30-06-2017",
year = "2017",
language = "English",

}

Brier, S 2017, 'Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion' Paper fremlagt ved 13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS, Kaunas, Litauen, 26/06/2017 - 30/06/2017, .

Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion. / Brier, Søren.

2017. Afhandling præsenteret på 13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS, Kaunas, Litauen.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion

AU - Brier, Søren

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - There is no doubt that spiritual and religious knowledge surrounds all of our cultural worldviews as Habermas argues and the cultural common sense knowing is the background for scientific knowing although a part of it strives to wards a universal a-historicity. This leaves the problem of how to negotiate a common platform that allows for both science and religion to work fruitfully together and at the same time conserve the ability to distinguish between them, which were Peirce’s vision. This is what Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology is about. In focus will have to be the concept of science or, which Deely always underlined, meant Peircean postmodern semiotic pragmaticist realism. Ontologically this meant that the universe is not only self-organizing driven by irreversible thermodynamics’ forming of dissipative structures or objective information organization as cybernetics and general system theory proposes, but by a semiotic grand argument developing a natural proposition from a very general form of feeling. This self-organized abstract semiotic logic based rationality is a normative agapistic movement toward Summon Bonum. Order and rationality is a common good not just between humans and their cultures, but also for their relation to nature’s evolution in this semiotic agapism.

AB - There is no doubt that spiritual and religious knowledge surrounds all of our cultural worldviews as Habermas argues and the cultural common sense knowing is the background for scientific knowing although a part of it strives to wards a universal a-historicity. This leaves the problem of how to negotiate a common platform that allows for both science and religion to work fruitfully together and at the same time conserve the ability to distinguish between them, which were Peirce’s vision. This is what Ashley and Deely’s book How Science Enriches Theology is about. In focus will have to be the concept of science or, which Deely always underlined, meant Peircean postmodern semiotic pragmaticist realism. Ontologically this meant that the universe is not only self-organizing driven by irreversible thermodynamics’ forming of dissipative structures or objective information organization as cybernetics and general system theory proposes, but by a semiotic grand argument developing a natural proposition from a very general form of feeling. This self-organized abstract semiotic logic based rationality is a normative agapistic movement toward Summon Bonum. Order and rationality is a common good not just between humans and their cultures, but also for their relation to nature’s evolution in this semiotic agapism.

KW - Deely

KW - Peirce

KW - Theology

KW - Semiotic ontology

KW - Deely

KW - Peirce

KW - Theology

KW - Semiotic ontology

M3 - Paper

ER -

Brier S. Deely on Consequences of Semiotic Ontology of Science, and Religion. 2017. Afhandling præsenteret på 13th IASS-AIS World Congress of Semiotics IASS, Kaunas, Litauen.