CSR as Aspirational Talk

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Most writings on corporate social responsibility (CSR) treat lack of consistency between organizational CSR talk and action as a serious problem that needs to be eliminated. In this article, we argue that differences between words and action are not necessarily a bad thing and that such discrepancies have the potential to stimulate CSR improvements. We draw on a research tradition that regards communication as performative to challenge the conventional assumption that CSR communication is essentially superficial, as opposed to CSR action. In addition, we extend notions of organizational hypocrisy to argue that aspirational CSR talk may be an important resource for social change, even when organizations do not fully live up to their aspirations.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOrganization
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)372-393
ISSN1350-5084
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2013

Emneord

  • Aspirational talk
  • Consistency
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • CSR
  • Differences between words and action
  • Hypocrisy

Citer dette

@article{9c6aa2b8b57b40898aec43f39a9a2b97,
title = "CSR as Aspirational Talk",
abstract = "Most writings on corporate social responsibility (CSR) treat lack of consistency between organizational CSR talk and action as a serious problem that needs to be eliminated. In this article, we argue that differences between words and action are not necessarily a bad thing and that such discrepancies have the potential to stimulate CSR improvements. We draw on a research tradition that regards communication as performative to challenge the conventional assumption that CSR communication is essentially superficial, as opposed to CSR action. In addition, we extend notions of organizational hypocrisy to argue that aspirational CSR talk may be an important resource for social change, even when organizations do not fully live up to their aspirations.",
keywords = "Aspirational talk, Consistency, Corporate social responsibility, CSR, Differences between words and action, Hypocrisy",
author = "Christensen, {Lars Th{\o}ger} and Mette Morsing and Ole Thyssen",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1350508413478310",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "372--393",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

CSR as Aspirational Talk. / Christensen, Lars Thøger; Morsing, Mette; Thyssen, Ole.

I: Organization, Bind 20, Nr. 3, 05.2013, s. 372-393 .

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - CSR as Aspirational Talk

AU - Christensen, Lars Thøger

AU - Morsing, Mette

AU - Thyssen, Ole

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Most writings on corporate social responsibility (CSR) treat lack of consistency between organizational CSR talk and action as a serious problem that needs to be eliminated. In this article, we argue that differences between words and action are not necessarily a bad thing and that such discrepancies have the potential to stimulate CSR improvements. We draw on a research tradition that regards communication as performative to challenge the conventional assumption that CSR communication is essentially superficial, as opposed to CSR action. In addition, we extend notions of organizational hypocrisy to argue that aspirational CSR talk may be an important resource for social change, even when organizations do not fully live up to their aspirations.

AB - Most writings on corporate social responsibility (CSR) treat lack of consistency between organizational CSR talk and action as a serious problem that needs to be eliminated. In this article, we argue that differences between words and action are not necessarily a bad thing and that such discrepancies have the potential to stimulate CSR improvements. We draw on a research tradition that regards communication as performative to challenge the conventional assumption that CSR communication is essentially superficial, as opposed to CSR action. In addition, we extend notions of organizational hypocrisy to argue that aspirational CSR talk may be an important resource for social change, even when organizations do not fully live up to their aspirations.

KW - Aspirational talk

KW - Consistency

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - CSR

KW - Differences between words and action

KW - Hypocrisy

U2 - 10.1177/1350508413478310

DO - 10.1177/1350508413478310

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 372

EP - 393

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 3

ER -