TY - JOUR
T1 - Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Value Chain
T2 - A Bargaining Perspective
AU - Geisler Asmussen, Christian
AU - Fosfuri, Andrea
AU - Møller Larsen, Marcus
AU - Santangelo, Grazia D.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Breaches of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global value chains (GVCs) pose a managerial challenge for multinational enterprises (MNEs) and threaten both their reputations and global sustainability. While an MNE-centric perspective on these issues has dominated existing international business research, we show that a dynamic view of bargaining among actors in the GVC can yield novel insights. We draw on coalitional game theory and develop a model where an MNE collaborates, monitors, and negotiates prices with a supplier whose CSR breaches may be revealed by the MNE, external agents, or remain hidden. Our model illustrates how MNEs may face a hold-up problem when irresponsible actions by suppliers are made public, and the suppliers have the power to engage in opportunistic renegotiation. Interestingly, we show that greater monitoring by MNEs, if not combined with specific strategies, can have negative consequences by weakening the MNE’s bargaining position and, in some cases, even prompting more irresponsible actions by the suppliers. Our model advances international business research on GVC sustainability and has important implications for managers and researchers alike.
AB - Breaches of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global value chains (GVCs) pose a managerial challenge for multinational enterprises (MNEs) and threaten both their reputations and global sustainability. While an MNE-centric perspective on these issues has dominated existing international business research, we show that a dynamic view of bargaining among actors in the GVC can yield novel insights. We draw on coalitional game theory and develop a model where an MNE collaborates, monitors, and negotiates prices with a supplier whose CSR breaches may be revealed by the MNE, external agents, or remain hidden. Our model illustrates how MNEs may face a hold-up problem when irresponsible actions by suppliers are made public, and the suppliers have the power to engage in opportunistic renegotiation. Interestingly, we show that greater monitoring by MNEs, if not combined with specific strategies, can have negative consequences by weakening the MNE’s bargaining position and, in some cases, even prompting more irresponsible actions by the suppliers. Our model advances international business research on GVC sustainability and has important implications for managers and researchers alike.
KW - GVCs
KW - Irresponsible behavior
KW - Game theory
KW - MNE–supplier relationships
KW - GVCs
KW - Irresponsible behavior
KW - Game theory
KW - MNE–supplier relationships
U2 - 10.1057/s41267-023-00635-w
DO - 10.1057/s41267-023-00635-w
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0047-2506
VL - 54
SP - 1175
EP - 1192
JO - Journal of International Business Studies
JF - Journal of International Business Studies
IS - 7
ER -