TY - JOUR
T1 - Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection
T2 - A Communal Perspective
AU - Hotho, Jasper J.
AU - Minbaeva, Dana
AU - Muratbekova-Touron, Maral
AU - Rabbiosi, Larissa
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - We examine how recruiting managers cope with communal norms and expectations of favoritism during recruitment and selection processes. Combining insights from institutional theory and network research, we develop a communal perspective on favoritism that presents favoritism as a social expectation to be managed. We subsequently hypothesize that the communal ties between job applicants and managers affect the strategies that managers employ to cope with this expectation. We test these ideas using a factorial survey of the effects of clan ties on recruitment and selection processes in Kazakhstan. The results confirm communal ties as antecedents to the strategies managers use to cope with communal favoritism. Surprisingly, the results also show that these coping strategies are relatively decoupled from managers’ recruitment decisions. The findings contribute to favoritism research by drawing attention to the mitigating work of managers in societies in whichfavoritism is common.
AB - We examine how recruiting managers cope with communal norms and expectations of favoritism during recruitment and selection processes. Combining insights from institutional theory and network research, we develop a communal perspective on favoritism that presents favoritism as a social expectation to be managed. We subsequently hypothesize that the communal ties between job applicants and managers affect the strategies that managers employ to cope with this expectation. We test these ideas using a factorial survey of the effects of clan ties on recruitment and selection processes in Kazakhstan. The results confirm communal ties as antecedents to the strategies managers use to cope with communal favoritism. Surprisingly, the results also show that these coping strategies are relatively decoupled from managers’ recruitment decisions. The findings contribute to favoritism research by drawing attention to the mitigating work of managers in societies in whichfavoritism is common.
KW - Business ethics
KW - Communities
KW - Favoritism
KW - Human resource management
KW - Institutional logics
KW - Recruitment and selection
KW - Business ethics
KW - Communities
KW - Favoritism
KW - Human resource management
KW - Institutional logics
KW - Recruitment and selection
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-018-4094-9
DO - 10.1007/s10551-018-4094-9
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 165
SP - 659
EP - 679
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 4
ER -