@techreport{62f58e6097ae473f88a302010faa6027,
title = "Constant Discounting, Temporal Instability and Dynamic Inconsistency in Denmark: A Longitudinal Field Experiment",
abstract = "Evidence that individuals have dynamically inconsistent preferences is usually generated by studying individual discount rates over different horizons, but where those discount rates are elicited at a single point in time. If these elicited discount rates are constant over different time horizons the individual is claimed to have preferences that imply dynamic consistency. However, to test dynamic consistency one has to know if the same subject has the same discounting function at a later point in time. In turn, longitudinal tests of temporal stability and dynamic consistency require that one allow for endogenous sample selection and attrition processes that can directly confound inferences about constant discounting, temporal stability and dynamic consistency. We evaluate a longitudinal experiment undertaken with a nationally representative sample of the adult Danish population, making these corrections. We cannot reject the hypothesis of constant discounting at the population level, but we reject the hypotheses of temporal stability and dynamic consistency.",
keywords = "Time preferences, Dynamic consistency, Longitudinal experiments, Sample selection and attrition, Time preferences, Dynamic consistency, Longitudinal experiments, Sample selection and attrition",
author = "Harrison, {Glenn W.} and Lau, {Morten I.} and Yoo, {Hong Il}",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "9",
language = "English",
series = "Working paper / Center for Economic Analysis of Risk (CEAR)",
publisher = "CEAR, Georgia State University",
number = "2020-09",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CEAR, Georgia State University",
}