Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research: Toward Critical Reflexivity

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

229 Downloads (Pure)

Abstrakt

Diverse and often unacknowledged assumptions underlie organizational conflict research. In this essay, we identify distinct ways of conceptualizing conflict in the theoretical domain of organizational conflict with the aim of setting a new critical agenda for reflexivity in conflict research. In doing so, we first apply a genealogical approach to study conceptions of conflict, and we find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work. Second, we employ two empirical examples of conflict to illustrate how organizational conflict research can benefit from a more reflexive approach and advance our understanding of conflict. In this essay, we emphasize how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict frame knowledge production within the field and we encourage future theory development to build on different notions of conflict to become better at coping with the complex and dynamic nature of conflict.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Management Inquiry
Vol/bind28
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)166-179
Antal sider14
ISSN1056-4926
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Published online: 29. June 2017

Emneord

  • Organizational conflict
  • Conflict Management
  • Philosophy of science
  • Reflexivity
  • Theorizing

Citationsformater