Compositional Advantage and Strategy

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    Resumé

    In this paper, I first critique the composition-based view of Yadong Luo and John Child for understanding how resource-poor firms survive and thrive. To remedy the deficiencies in their perspective, I then propose a dynamic theory of compositional advantage and strategy. Here, the compositional advantage is redefined as the attractiveness of the composition of the producer’s offering in terms of scope and perceived value/price ratio. I identify five ways or basic compositional strategies to improve the value/price ratio. A firm may have an overall compositional strategy that is composed of some or all of the five basic compositional strategies. I argue there are three indispensable key success factors for a composition-based competition, i.e., aspiration (ambition-position asymmetry), attitude (being ALERT), and action (turning asymmetry into advantage). I also discuss the particular relevance of the present theory to understanding Chinese firms. I conclude with managerial implications and suggestions for future research.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Udgivelses stedFrederiksberg
    UdgiverAsia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School
    Antal sider36
    StatusUdgivet - 2016
    NavnCopenhagen Discussion Papers
    Nummer63
    ISSN0904-8626

    Emneord

    • Composition
    • Advantage
    • Strategy
    • Value/price ratio
    • Key success factor
    • Asymmetry

    Citer dette

    Li, X. (2016). Compositional Advantage and Strategy. Frederiksberg: Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School. Copenhagen Discussion Papers, Nr. 63
    Li, Xin. / Compositional Advantage and Strategy. Frederiksberg : Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School, 2016. (Copenhagen Discussion Papers; Nr. 63).
    @techreport{95702dc1122847beb5b42c7614eeb3e0,
    title = "Compositional Advantage and Strategy",
    abstract = "In this paper, I first critique the composition-based view of Yadong Luo and John Child for understanding how resource-poor firms survive and thrive. To remedy the deficiencies in their perspective, I then propose a dynamic theory of compositional advantage and strategy. Here, the compositional advantage is redefined as the attractiveness of the composition of the producer’s offering in terms of scope and perceived value/price ratio. I identify five ways or basic compositional strategies to improve the value/price ratio. A firm may have an overall compositional strategy that is composed of some or all of the five basic compositional strategies. I argue there are three indispensable key success factors for a composition-based competition, i.e., aspiration (ambition-position asymmetry), attitude (being ALERT), and action (turning asymmetry into advantage). I also discuss the particular relevance of the present theory to understanding Chinese firms. I conclude with managerial implications and suggestions for future research.",
    keywords = "Composition, Advantage, Strategy, Value/price ratio, Key success factor, Asymmetry, Composition, Advantage, Strategy, Value/price ratio, Key success factor, Asymmetry",
    author = "Xin Li",
    year = "2016",
    language = "English",
    series = "Copenhagen Discussion Papers",
    number = "63",
    publisher = "Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School",
    address = "Denmark",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School",

    }

    Li, X 2016 'Compositional Advantage and Strategy' Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg.

    Compositional Advantage and Strategy. / Li, Xin.

    Frederiksberg : Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School, 2016.

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Compositional Advantage and Strategy

    AU - Li, Xin

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - In this paper, I first critique the composition-based view of Yadong Luo and John Child for understanding how resource-poor firms survive and thrive. To remedy the deficiencies in their perspective, I then propose a dynamic theory of compositional advantage and strategy. Here, the compositional advantage is redefined as the attractiveness of the composition of the producer’s offering in terms of scope and perceived value/price ratio. I identify five ways or basic compositional strategies to improve the value/price ratio. A firm may have an overall compositional strategy that is composed of some or all of the five basic compositional strategies. I argue there are three indispensable key success factors for a composition-based competition, i.e., aspiration (ambition-position asymmetry), attitude (being ALERT), and action (turning asymmetry into advantage). I also discuss the particular relevance of the present theory to understanding Chinese firms. I conclude with managerial implications and suggestions for future research.

    AB - In this paper, I first critique the composition-based view of Yadong Luo and John Child for understanding how resource-poor firms survive and thrive. To remedy the deficiencies in their perspective, I then propose a dynamic theory of compositional advantage and strategy. Here, the compositional advantage is redefined as the attractiveness of the composition of the producer’s offering in terms of scope and perceived value/price ratio. I identify five ways or basic compositional strategies to improve the value/price ratio. A firm may have an overall compositional strategy that is composed of some or all of the five basic compositional strategies. I argue there are three indispensable key success factors for a composition-based competition, i.e., aspiration (ambition-position asymmetry), attitude (being ALERT), and action (turning asymmetry into advantage). I also discuss the particular relevance of the present theory to understanding Chinese firms. I conclude with managerial implications and suggestions for future research.

    KW - Composition

    KW - Advantage

    KW - Strategy

    KW - Value/price ratio

    KW - Key success factor

    KW - Asymmetry

    KW - Composition

    KW - Advantage

    KW - Strategy

    KW - Value/price ratio

    KW - Key success factor

    KW - Asymmetry

    M3 - Working paper

    T3 - Copenhagen Discussion Papers

    BT - Compositional Advantage and Strategy

    PB - Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School

    CY - Frederiksberg

    ER -

    Li X. Compositional Advantage and Strategy. Frederiksberg: Asia Research Centre. Copenhagen Business School. 2016.