Company Delistings from the UN Global Compact: Limited Business Demand or Domestic Governance Failure?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


    While a substantial amount of the literature describes corporate benefits of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, the literature is silent concerning why some companies announce CSR initiatives, yet fail to implement them. The article examines company delistings from the UN Global Compact. Delistings are surprising because the CSR agenda is seen as having won the battle of ideas. The analysis proceeds in two parts. I first analyze firm-level characteristics focusing on geography while controlling for sector and size; I find that geography is a significant factor while small firms are more likely to be delisted than large firms and some sector characteristics determine delistings. Next, I proceed to uncover country-level characteristics including the degree of international economic interdependence as well as the quality of governance institutions. Multivariate regression analysis shows that companies are less likely to be delisted from countries where domestic governance institutions are well-functioning. To a lesser extent, I find that firms from countries with international economies are more willing to comply with the UN Global Compact requirements. Countries with a high share of outward FDI/capita have a lower share of delisted firms as do countries that are internationally competitive.
    TidsskriftJournal of Business Ethics
    Udgave nummer3
    Sider (fra-til)331-349
    StatusUdgivet - 2011


    • business/government interaction and relations
    • political economy
    • global institutions
    • country variables
    • Corporate Social Responsibility