Combining Stocks and Flows of Knowledge

The Effects of Intra-Functional and Cross-Functional Complementarity

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    Resumé

    In the area of knowledge management and knowledge governance, previous research has mostly focused on either knowledge stocks or knowledge flows of firms or organizational units. Contrary to this work, our study is among the first to integrate these two perspectives in order to shed light on the complementarity effects of different types of knowledge stocks and flows in the multinational corporation (MNC). We investigate intra-functional as well as cross-functional complementarity effects from the perspective of the knowledge recipient. We test the impact of stocks on flows on the benefit that is created for MNC units. Based on a comprehensive sample of 324 relationships between MNC units we find that both types of complementarity create benefits for these units, but that the effects from intra-functional combinations of knowledge stocks and flows are significantly stronger than from cross-functional combinations.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Udgivelses stedwww
    UdgiverSSRN: Social Science Research Network
    Antal sider32
    StatusUdgivet - 2012

    Emneord

    • Knowledge management
    • Knowledge stocks
    • Knowledge flows
    • Knowledge transfer
    • Transfer benefits

    Citer dette

    @techreport{caeb2838e2c949a0b76755be59f4d755,
    title = "Combining Stocks and Flows of Knowledge: The Effects of Intra-Functional and Cross-Functional Complementarity",
    abstract = "In the area of knowledge management and knowledge governance, previous research has mostly focused on either knowledge stocks or knowledge flows of firms or organizational units. Contrary to this work, our study is among the first to integrate these two perspectives in order to shed light on the complementarity effects of different types of knowledge stocks and flows in the multinational corporation (MNC). We investigate intra-functional as well as cross-functional complementarity effects from the perspective of the knowledge recipient. We test the impact of stocks on flows on the benefit that is created for MNC units. Based on a comprehensive sample of 324 relationships between MNC units we find that both types of complementarity create benefits for these units, but that the effects from intra-functional combinations of knowledge stocks and flows are significantly stronger than from cross-functional combinations.",
    keywords = "Knowledge management, Knowledge stocks, Knowledge flows, Knowledge transfer, Transfer benefits , Knowledge Management, Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows, Knowledge Transfer, Transfer Benefits",
    author = "Ambos, {Tina C.} and Nell, {Phillip Christopher} and Torben Pedersen",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "SSRN: Social Science Research Network",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "SSRN: Social Science Research Network",

    }

    Combining Stocks and Flows of Knowledge : The Effects of Intra-Functional and Cross-Functional Complementarity . / Ambos, Tina C.; Nell, Phillip Christopher; Pedersen, Torben.

    www : SSRN: Social Science Research Network, 2012.

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Combining Stocks and Flows of Knowledge

    T2 - The Effects of Intra-Functional and Cross-Functional Complementarity

    AU - Ambos, Tina C.

    AU - Nell, Phillip Christopher

    AU - Pedersen, Torben

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In the area of knowledge management and knowledge governance, previous research has mostly focused on either knowledge stocks or knowledge flows of firms or organizational units. Contrary to this work, our study is among the first to integrate these two perspectives in order to shed light on the complementarity effects of different types of knowledge stocks and flows in the multinational corporation (MNC). We investigate intra-functional as well as cross-functional complementarity effects from the perspective of the knowledge recipient. We test the impact of stocks on flows on the benefit that is created for MNC units. Based on a comprehensive sample of 324 relationships between MNC units we find that both types of complementarity create benefits for these units, but that the effects from intra-functional combinations of knowledge stocks and flows are significantly stronger than from cross-functional combinations.

    AB - In the area of knowledge management and knowledge governance, previous research has mostly focused on either knowledge stocks or knowledge flows of firms or organizational units. Contrary to this work, our study is among the first to integrate these two perspectives in order to shed light on the complementarity effects of different types of knowledge stocks and flows in the multinational corporation (MNC). We investigate intra-functional as well as cross-functional complementarity effects from the perspective of the knowledge recipient. We test the impact of stocks on flows on the benefit that is created for MNC units. Based on a comprehensive sample of 324 relationships between MNC units we find that both types of complementarity create benefits for these units, but that the effects from intra-functional combinations of knowledge stocks and flows are significantly stronger than from cross-functional combinations.

    KW - Knowledge management

    KW - Knowledge stocks

    KW - Knowledge flows

    KW - Knowledge transfer

    KW - Transfer benefits

    KW - Knowledge Management

    KW - Knowledge Stocks

    KW - Knowledge Flows

    KW - Knowledge Transfer

    KW - Transfer Benefits

    M3 - Working paper

    BT - Combining Stocks and Flows of Knowledge

    PB - SSRN: Social Science Research Network

    CY - www

    ER -