Civil Society Organizations: The Site of Legitimizing the Common Good - a Literature Review

Liv Egholm, Liesbet Heyse, Damien Mourey

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The concept of legitimacy—i.e., being regarded as “lawful, admissible, and justified” (Edwards in NGO rights and responsibilities: a new deal for global governance, The Foreign Policy Center, London, 2000)—is pivotal within civil society research. Recently, the concept has applied to wider notions concerning the civil sphere and civic action. The introductory article of this special issue aims to provide an overview of conceptualizations of legitimacy within civil society research and to point at new avenues for future research. We depart from Suddaby et al.’s (Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478, 2017) configurations of legitimacy within management literature: as property, perception, and process. While these configurations are also reflected in civil society literature, with legitimacy as property being prominent, they do not capture the full scope of civil society literature on legitimacy, given its multidisciplinary nature, its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, and the presence of complementary conceptualizations of legitimacy. We posit that the legitimacy-as-relations-in-processes perspective is valuable for advancing research in civil society organizations.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftVOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1-18
Antal sider18
ISSN0957-8765
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Published online: 10. October 2019

Emneord

  • Civil society
  • Legitimacy
  • Literature review
  • Non profit sector
  • Accountability

Citer dette

@article{867bb99b3b0b4899b897425efa8afc3a,
title = "Civil Society Organizations: The Site of Legitimizing the Common Good - a Literature Review",
abstract = "The concept of legitimacy—i.e., being regarded as “lawful, admissible, and justified” (Edwards in NGO rights and responsibilities: a new deal for global governance, The Foreign Policy Center, London, 2000)—is pivotal within civil society research. Recently, the concept has applied to wider notions concerning the civil sphere and civic action. The introductory article of this special issue aims to provide an overview of conceptualizations of legitimacy within civil society research and to point at new avenues for future research. We depart from Suddaby et al.’s (Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478, 2017) configurations of legitimacy within management literature: as property, perception, and process. While these configurations are also reflected in civil society literature, with legitimacy as property being prominent, they do not capture the full scope of civil society literature on legitimacy, given its multidisciplinary nature, its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, and the presence of complementary conceptualizations of legitimacy. We posit that the legitimacy-as-relations-in-processes perspective is valuable for advancing research in civil society organizations.",
keywords = "Civil society, Legitimacy, Literature review, Non profit sector, Accountability, Civil society, Legitimacy, Literature review, Non profit sector, Accountability",
author = "Liv Egholm and Liesbet Heyse and Damien Mourey",
note = "Published online: 10. October 2019",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s11266-019-00171-y",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations",
issn = "0957-8765",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Civil Society Organizations : The Site of Legitimizing the Common Good - a Literature Review. / Egholm, Liv; Heyse, Liesbet; Mourey, Damien.

I: VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Bind 31, Nr. 1, 02.2020, s. 1-18.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Civil Society Organizations

T2 - The Site of Legitimizing the Common Good - a Literature Review

AU - Egholm, Liv

AU - Heyse, Liesbet

AU - Mourey, Damien

N1 - Published online: 10. October 2019

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - The concept of legitimacy—i.e., being regarded as “lawful, admissible, and justified” (Edwards in NGO rights and responsibilities: a new deal for global governance, The Foreign Policy Center, London, 2000)—is pivotal within civil society research. Recently, the concept has applied to wider notions concerning the civil sphere and civic action. The introductory article of this special issue aims to provide an overview of conceptualizations of legitimacy within civil society research and to point at new avenues for future research. We depart from Suddaby et al.’s (Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478, 2017) configurations of legitimacy within management literature: as property, perception, and process. While these configurations are also reflected in civil society literature, with legitimacy as property being prominent, they do not capture the full scope of civil society literature on legitimacy, given its multidisciplinary nature, its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, and the presence of complementary conceptualizations of legitimacy. We posit that the legitimacy-as-relations-in-processes perspective is valuable for advancing research in civil society organizations.

AB - The concept of legitimacy—i.e., being regarded as “lawful, admissible, and justified” (Edwards in NGO rights and responsibilities: a new deal for global governance, The Foreign Policy Center, London, 2000)—is pivotal within civil society research. Recently, the concept has applied to wider notions concerning the civil sphere and civic action. The introductory article of this special issue aims to provide an overview of conceptualizations of legitimacy within civil society research and to point at new avenues for future research. We depart from Suddaby et al.’s (Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478, 2017) configurations of legitimacy within management literature: as property, perception, and process. While these configurations are also reflected in civil society literature, with legitimacy as property being prominent, they do not capture the full scope of civil society literature on legitimacy, given its multidisciplinary nature, its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, and the presence of complementary conceptualizations of legitimacy. We posit that the legitimacy-as-relations-in-processes perspective is valuable for advancing research in civil society organizations.

KW - Civil society

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Literature review

KW - Non profit sector

KW - Accountability

KW - Civil society

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Literature review

KW - Non profit sector

KW - Accountability

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=960239210910&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1007/s11266-019-00171-y

DO - 10.1007/s11266-019-00171-y

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations

JF - VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations

SN - 0957-8765

IS - 1

ER -