Capitalist Diversity and De-growth Trajectories to Steady-state Economies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Growth-critical scholarship has done much to both expose the environmentally unsustainable nature of the capitalist growth-economies of the overdeveloped part of the world and to develop an alternative vision of a degrowth transition leading to a steady-state economy. However, this scholarship fails to adequately take into consideration that if planned de-growth actuallymaterialised itwould do so in societies that differ considerably from one another and that this would have implications both for the transition processes and the nature of their outcomes. In other words, not enough importance is ascribed to capitalist diversity and the nature of institutional change in the growth-critical literature. Against this background, the purpose of the present article is to make the “concrete utopia” of de-growth scholars and steady-state economists more specific by utilising insights from scholarship on capitalist diversity and institutional change. On the basis of a typology of different models of capitalism, the article suggests that if de-growth transitions took place they would take different forms and lead to a variety of types of steady-state economies (SSEs). To illustrate this point, three ideal-typical SSEs are delineated.
    Growth-critical scholarship has done much to both expose the environmentally unsustainable nature of the capitalist growth-economies of the overdeveloped part of the world and to develop an alternative vision of a degrowth transition leading to a steady-state economy. However, this scholarship fails to adequately take into consideration that if planned de-growth actuallymaterialised itwould do so in societies that differ considerably from one another and that this would have implications both for the transition processes and the nature of their outcomes. In other words, not enough importance is ascribed to capitalist diversity and the nature of institutional change in the growth-critical literature. Against this background, the purpose of the present article is to make the “concrete utopia” of de-growth scholars and steady-state economists more specific by utilising insights from scholarship on capitalist diversity and institutional change. On the basis of a typology of different models of capitalism, the article suggests that if de-growth transitions took place they would take different forms and lead to a variety of types of steady-state economies (SSEs). To illustrate this point, three ideal-typical SSEs are delineated.
    SprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftEcological Economics
    Vol/bind106
    Sider167-173
    ISSN0921-8009
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - okt. 2014

    Emneord

    • Capitalist diversity
    • De-growth
    • Economic growth
    • Institutional change
    • Steady-state economy

    Citer dette

    @article{51e7f51032af4473b1c25207d4d0fa83,
    title = "Capitalist Diversity and De-growth Trajectories to Steady-state Economies",
    abstract = "Growth-critical scholarship has done much to both expose the environmentally unsustainable nature of the capitalist growth-economies of the overdeveloped part of the world and to develop an alternative vision of a degrowth transition leading to a steady-state economy. However, this scholarship fails to adequately take into consideration that if planned de-growth actuallymaterialised itwould do so in societies that differ considerably from one another and that this would have implications both for the transition processes and the nature of their outcomes. In other words, not enough importance is ascribed to capitalist diversity and the nature of institutional change in the growth-critical literature. Against this background, the purpose of the present article is to make the “concrete utopia” of de-growth scholars and steady-state economists more specific by utilising insights from scholarship on capitalist diversity and institutional change. On the basis of a typology of different models of capitalism, the article suggests that if de-growth transitions took place they would take different forms and lead to a variety of types of steady-state economies (SSEs). To illustrate this point, three ideal-typical SSEs are delineated.",
    keywords = "Capitalist diversity, De-growth, Economic growth, Institutional change, Steady-state economy",
    author = "Hubert Buch-Hansen",
    year = "2014",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.030",
    language = "English",
    volume = "106",
    pages = "167--173",
    journal = "Ecological Economics",
    issn = "0921-8009",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Capitalist Diversity and De-growth Trajectories to Steady-state Economies. / Buch-Hansen, Hubert.

    I: Ecological Economics, Bind 106, 10.2014, s. 167-173.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Capitalist Diversity and De-growth Trajectories to Steady-state Economies

    AU - Buch-Hansen,Hubert

    PY - 2014/10

    Y1 - 2014/10

    N2 - Growth-critical scholarship has done much to both expose the environmentally unsustainable nature of the capitalist growth-economies of the overdeveloped part of the world and to develop an alternative vision of a degrowth transition leading to a steady-state economy. However, this scholarship fails to adequately take into consideration that if planned de-growth actuallymaterialised itwould do so in societies that differ considerably from one another and that this would have implications both for the transition processes and the nature of their outcomes. In other words, not enough importance is ascribed to capitalist diversity and the nature of institutional change in the growth-critical literature. Against this background, the purpose of the present article is to make the “concrete utopia” of de-growth scholars and steady-state economists more specific by utilising insights from scholarship on capitalist diversity and institutional change. On the basis of a typology of different models of capitalism, the article suggests that if de-growth transitions took place they would take different forms and lead to a variety of types of steady-state economies (SSEs). To illustrate this point, three ideal-typical SSEs are delineated.

    AB - Growth-critical scholarship has done much to both expose the environmentally unsustainable nature of the capitalist growth-economies of the overdeveloped part of the world and to develop an alternative vision of a degrowth transition leading to a steady-state economy. However, this scholarship fails to adequately take into consideration that if planned de-growth actuallymaterialised itwould do so in societies that differ considerably from one another and that this would have implications both for the transition processes and the nature of their outcomes. In other words, not enough importance is ascribed to capitalist diversity and the nature of institutional change in the growth-critical literature. Against this background, the purpose of the present article is to make the “concrete utopia” of de-growth scholars and steady-state economists more specific by utilising insights from scholarship on capitalist diversity and institutional change. On the basis of a typology of different models of capitalism, the article suggests that if de-growth transitions took place they would take different forms and lead to a variety of types of steady-state economies (SSEs). To illustrate this point, three ideal-typical SSEs are delineated.

    KW - Capitalist diversity

    KW - De-growth

    KW - Economic growth

    KW - Institutional change

    KW - Steady-state economy

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925565687&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.030

    DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.030

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 106

    SP - 167

    EP - 173

    JO - Ecological Economics

    T2 - Ecological Economics

    JF - Ecological Economics

    SN - 0921-8009

    ER -