Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy

Benjamin Carl Krag Egerod, Mogens Kamp Justesen

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Capital mobility and corporate lobbying are often emphasized as key drivers of international trade policy. Most empirical research on the topic, however, has focused on the industry level or some level of geographical aggregation. We address this gap by examining the role of firm-level capital mobility in shaping trade protection. We unfold a two-stage argument, where it is more costly for firms with immobile assets to reorganize production in the face of international competition. This makes them lobby more intensively for protection. But because protectionism is costly, decision-makers have a limit to how much they will implement. This forces companies to compete for trade protection, and the success of immobile firms will decrease the likelihood that others gain protection as well. To test this argument, we marshal a dataset of approximately 2,500 antidumping petitions and combine it with financial data on the firms filing them – a total of roughly 1,000 companies from 25 WTO countries in the period 2005-2015. Using spatial autoregressive (SAR) models, we show that companies with less mobile assets are, on average, more likely to be successful when petitioning for trade protection. Additionally, we find that the success of the immobile companies decreases the protection afforded to the firms they compete with for antidumping duties.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Publikationsdato2017
    Antal sider23
    StatusUdgivet - 2017
    BegivenhedAmerican Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017: The Quest for Legitimacy: Actors, Audiences, and Aspirations - San Francisco, USA
    Varighed: 31 aug. 20173 sep. 2017
    Konferencens nummer: 113
    http://web.apsanet.org/apsa2017/

    Konference

    KonferenceAmerican Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017
    Nummer113
    LandUSA
    BySan Francisco
    Periode31/08/201703/09/2017
    Internetadresse

    Bibliografisk note

    CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

    Citer dette

    Egerod, B. C. K., & Justesen, M. K. (2017). Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017, San Francisco, USA.
    Egerod, Benjamin Carl Krag ; Justesen, Mogens Kamp. / Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017, San Francisco, USA.23 s.
    @conference{cf2b35f47fec4eb08403f4512edd5cf6,
    title = "Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy",
    abstract = "Capital mobility and corporate lobbying are often emphasized as key drivers of international trade policy. Most empirical research on the topic, however, has focused on the industry level or some level of geographical aggregation. We address this gap by examining the role of firm-level capital mobility in shaping trade protection. We unfold a two-stage argument, where it is more costly for firms with immobile assets to reorganize production in the face of international competition. This makes them lobby more intensively for protection. But because protectionism is costly, decision-makers have a limit to how much they will implement. This forces companies to compete for trade protection, and the success of immobile firms will decrease the likelihood that others gain protection as well. To test this argument, we marshal a dataset of approximately 2,500 antidumping petitions and combine it with financial data on the firms filing them – a total of roughly 1,000 companies from 25 WTO countries in the period 2005-2015. Using spatial autoregressive (SAR) models, we show that companies with less mobile assets are, on average, more likely to be successful when petitioning for trade protection. Additionally, we find that the success of the immobile companies decreases the protection afforded to the firms they compete with for antidumping duties.",
    author = "Egerod, {Benjamin Carl Krag} and Justesen, {Mogens Kamp}",
    note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 31-08-2017 Through 03-09-2017",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    url = "http://web.apsanet.org/apsa2017/",

    }

    Egerod, BCK & Justesen, MK 2017, 'Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy' Paper fremlagt ved American Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017, San Francisco, USA, 31/08/2017 - 03/09/2017, .

    Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy. / Egerod, Benjamin Carl Krag; Justesen, Mogens Kamp.

    2017. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017, San Francisco, USA.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy

    AU - Egerod, Benjamin Carl Krag

    AU - Justesen, Mogens Kamp

    N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Capital mobility and corporate lobbying are often emphasized as key drivers of international trade policy. Most empirical research on the topic, however, has focused on the industry level or some level of geographical aggregation. We address this gap by examining the role of firm-level capital mobility in shaping trade protection. We unfold a two-stage argument, where it is more costly for firms with immobile assets to reorganize production in the face of international competition. This makes them lobby more intensively for protection. But because protectionism is costly, decision-makers have a limit to how much they will implement. This forces companies to compete for trade protection, and the success of immobile firms will decrease the likelihood that others gain protection as well. To test this argument, we marshal a dataset of approximately 2,500 antidumping petitions and combine it with financial data on the firms filing them – a total of roughly 1,000 companies from 25 WTO countries in the period 2005-2015. Using spatial autoregressive (SAR) models, we show that companies with less mobile assets are, on average, more likely to be successful when petitioning for trade protection. Additionally, we find that the success of the immobile companies decreases the protection afforded to the firms they compete with for antidumping duties.

    AB - Capital mobility and corporate lobbying are often emphasized as key drivers of international trade policy. Most empirical research on the topic, however, has focused on the industry level or some level of geographical aggregation. We address this gap by examining the role of firm-level capital mobility in shaping trade protection. We unfold a two-stage argument, where it is more costly for firms with immobile assets to reorganize production in the face of international competition. This makes them lobby more intensively for protection. But because protectionism is costly, decision-makers have a limit to how much they will implement. This forces companies to compete for trade protection, and the success of immobile firms will decrease the likelihood that others gain protection as well. To test this argument, we marshal a dataset of approximately 2,500 antidumping petitions and combine it with financial data on the firms filing them – a total of roughly 1,000 companies from 25 WTO countries in the period 2005-2015. Using spatial autoregressive (SAR) models, we show that companies with less mobile assets are, on average, more likely to be successful when petitioning for trade protection. Additionally, we find that the success of the immobile companies decreases the protection afforded to the firms they compete with for antidumping duties.

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Egerod BCK, Justesen MK. Capital Mobility, Corporate Protection, and Trade Policy. 2017. Afhandling præsenteret på American Political Science Association, APSA Annual Meeting 2017, San Francisco, USA.