Building Corporate Reputation with Stakeholders

Exploring the Role of Message Ambiguity for Social Marketers

Sonia Dickinson‐Delaporte, Michael Beverland, Adam Lindgreen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose: – Managing the corporate reputation of hybrid firms (organizations that act commercially to pursue social agendas) involves particular challenges because of competing stakeholder interests. With reference to the Trappist beer market, the paper seeks to identify the value of message ambiguity in reducing stakeholder tension, while simultaneously achieving a clear market positioning.
Design/methodology/approach: – In total, 25 in‐depth interviews were conducted with brand marketers, owners, channel buyers, industry representatives and consumers.
Findings: – The findings demonstrate how ambiguous communications minimize tension between stakeholders. One form of ambiguous message strategy is identified – i.e. the deliberate use of “authenticity” as a positioning device. This positioning allows stakeholders to ascribe conflicting meanings to the Trappist brand, resulting in increased reputation and decreased stakeholder tension.
Research limitations/implications: – The use of authenticity and message ambiguity represents one means of balancing stakeholder interests, while achieving a clear market position. The paper believes the findings are particularly relevant for social marketers and managers of highly symbolic brands.
Originality/value: – Marketers can reduce stakeholder conflict through the use of brand images that emphasize normative as opposed to performance‐based commitments. Such commitments need to be broad enough to allow different stakeholders to ascribe their own meaning to the brand without diminishing the strength of the firm's market position.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Marketing
Vol/bind44
Udgave nummer11/12
Sider (fra-til)1856-1874
ISSN0309-0566
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2010
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Stakeholders
  • Corporate image
  • Non‐profit organizations
  • Communications

Citer dette

@article{9f15458deba04b9c8dfdefa7b01e2f89,
title = "Building Corporate Reputation with Stakeholders: Exploring the Role of Message Ambiguity for Social Marketers",
abstract = "Purpose: – Managing the corporate reputation of hybrid firms (organizations that act commercially to pursue social agendas) involves particular challenges because of competing stakeholder interests. With reference to the Trappist beer market, the paper seeks to identify the value of message ambiguity in reducing stakeholder tension, while simultaneously achieving a clear market positioning.Design/methodology/approach: – In total, 25 in‐depth interviews were conducted with brand marketers, owners, channel buyers, industry representatives and consumers.Findings: – The findings demonstrate how ambiguous communications minimize tension between stakeholders. One form of ambiguous message strategy is identified – i.e. the deliberate use of “authenticity” as a positioning device. This positioning allows stakeholders to ascribe conflicting meanings to the Trappist brand, resulting in increased reputation and decreased stakeholder tension.Research limitations/implications: – The use of authenticity and message ambiguity represents one means of balancing stakeholder interests, while achieving a clear market position. The paper believes the findings are particularly relevant for social marketers and managers of highly symbolic brands.Originality/value: – Marketers can reduce stakeholder conflict through the use of brand images that emphasize normative as opposed to performance‐based commitments. Such commitments need to be broad enough to allow different stakeholders to ascribe their own meaning to the brand without diminishing the strength of the firm's market position.",
keywords = "Stakeholders, Corporate image, Non‐profit organizations, Communications",
author = "Sonia Dickinson‐Delaporte and Michael Beverland and Adam Lindgreen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1108/03090561011079918",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1856--1874",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "11/12",

}

Building Corporate Reputation with Stakeholders : Exploring the Role of Message Ambiguity for Social Marketers. / Dickinson‐Delaporte, Sonia; Beverland, Michael; Lindgreen, Adam.

I: European Journal of Marketing, Bind 44, Nr. 11/12, 2010, s. 1856-1874.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Corporate Reputation with Stakeholders

T2 - Exploring the Role of Message Ambiguity for Social Marketers

AU - Dickinson‐Delaporte, Sonia

AU - Beverland, Michael

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: – Managing the corporate reputation of hybrid firms (organizations that act commercially to pursue social agendas) involves particular challenges because of competing stakeholder interests. With reference to the Trappist beer market, the paper seeks to identify the value of message ambiguity in reducing stakeholder tension, while simultaneously achieving a clear market positioning.Design/methodology/approach: – In total, 25 in‐depth interviews were conducted with brand marketers, owners, channel buyers, industry representatives and consumers.Findings: – The findings demonstrate how ambiguous communications minimize tension between stakeholders. One form of ambiguous message strategy is identified – i.e. the deliberate use of “authenticity” as a positioning device. This positioning allows stakeholders to ascribe conflicting meanings to the Trappist brand, resulting in increased reputation and decreased stakeholder tension.Research limitations/implications: – The use of authenticity and message ambiguity represents one means of balancing stakeholder interests, while achieving a clear market position. The paper believes the findings are particularly relevant for social marketers and managers of highly symbolic brands.Originality/value: – Marketers can reduce stakeholder conflict through the use of brand images that emphasize normative as opposed to performance‐based commitments. Such commitments need to be broad enough to allow different stakeholders to ascribe their own meaning to the brand without diminishing the strength of the firm's market position.

AB - Purpose: – Managing the corporate reputation of hybrid firms (organizations that act commercially to pursue social agendas) involves particular challenges because of competing stakeholder interests. With reference to the Trappist beer market, the paper seeks to identify the value of message ambiguity in reducing stakeholder tension, while simultaneously achieving a clear market positioning.Design/methodology/approach: – In total, 25 in‐depth interviews were conducted with brand marketers, owners, channel buyers, industry representatives and consumers.Findings: – The findings demonstrate how ambiguous communications minimize tension between stakeholders. One form of ambiguous message strategy is identified – i.e. the deliberate use of “authenticity” as a positioning device. This positioning allows stakeholders to ascribe conflicting meanings to the Trappist brand, resulting in increased reputation and decreased stakeholder tension.Research limitations/implications: – The use of authenticity and message ambiguity represents one means of balancing stakeholder interests, while achieving a clear market position. The paper believes the findings are particularly relevant for social marketers and managers of highly symbolic brands.Originality/value: – Marketers can reduce stakeholder conflict through the use of brand images that emphasize normative as opposed to performance‐based commitments. Such commitments need to be broad enough to allow different stakeholders to ascribe their own meaning to the brand without diminishing the strength of the firm's market position.

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Corporate image

KW - Non‐profit organizations

KW - Communications

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921389941

U2 - 10.1108/03090561011079918

DO - 10.1108/03090561011079918

M3 - Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 1856

EP - 1874

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 11/12

ER -