Beyond Luhmann: The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity

Publikation: Bidrag til konferencePaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

In an overall manner, this paper advances the argument that systems theory can benefit from two epistemological moves. First: A move away from a focus on differentiation to a focus on connectivity, i.e. a move from an intra-systemic to an inter-systemic perspective. Second: A related move towards a multi-level theory of society emphasizing vertical relations between local, national and transnational processes complementing the systems theory focus on horizontal relations between function systems. This double move, furthermore provide the basis for an understanding of global law as inter-legality. Concretely, global law settings are characterised by a structural pre-eminence of connectivity norms, a type of norm which differs from coherency or possibility norms. The centrality of connectivity norms emerges from the function of global law, which is to increase the probability of transfers of condensed social components, such as economic capital and products, religious doctrines and scientific knowledge, from one legally structured context to another within world society. This was the case from colonialism and colonial law to contemporary global supply chains and human rights. Both colonial law and human rights can be understood as serving a constitutionalising function aimed at stabilising and facilitating connectivity. This allows for an understanding of colonialism and contemporary global governance as functional, but not as normative, equivalents.
In an overall manner, this paper advances the argument that systems theory can benefit from two epistemological moves. First: A move away from a focus on differentiation to a focus on connectivity, i.e. a move from an intra-systemic to an inter-systemic perspective. Second: A related move towards a multi-level theory of society emphasizing vertical relations between local, national and transnational processes complementing the systems theory focus on horizontal relations between function systems. This double move, furthermore provide the basis for an understanding of global law as inter-legality. Concretely, global law settings are characterised by a structural pre-eminence of connectivity norms, a type of norm which differs from coherency or possibility norms. The centrality of connectivity norms emerges from the function of global law, which is to increase the probability of transfers of condensed social components, such as economic capital and products, religious doctrines and scientific knowledge, from one legally structured context to another within world society. This was the case from colonialism and colonial law to contemporary global supply chains and human rights. Both colonial law and human rights can be understood as serving a constitutionalising function aimed at stabilising and facilitating connectivity. This allows for an understanding of colonialism and contemporary global governance as functional, but not as normative, equivalents.

Workshop

WorkshopLuhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society
LandSpanien
ByOñati
Periode26/07/201827/07/2018

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Citer dette

Kjær, P. F. (2018). Beyond Luhmann: The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity. Afhandling præsenteret på Luhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society , Oñati, Spanien.
Kjær, Poul F./ Beyond Luhmann : The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity. Afhandling præsenteret på Luhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society , Oñati, Spanien.24 s.
@conference{4fbca137937448869154d967b31b8f21,
title = "Beyond Luhmann: The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity",
abstract = "In an overall manner, this paper advances the argument that systems theory can benefit from two epistemological moves. First: A move away from a focus on differentiation to a focus on connectivity, i.e. a move from an intra-systemic to an inter-systemic perspective. Second: A related move towards a multi-level theory of society emphasizing vertical relations between local, national and transnational processes complementing the systems theory focus on horizontal relations between function systems. This double move, furthermore provide the basis for an understanding of global law as inter-legality. Concretely, global law settings are characterised by a structural pre-eminence of connectivity norms, a type of norm which differs from coherency or possibility norms. The centrality of connectivity norms emerges from the function of global law, which is to increase the probability of transfers of condensed social components, such as economic capital and products, religious doctrines and scientific knowledge, from one legally structured context to another within world society. This was the case from colonialism and colonial law to contemporary global supply chains and human rights. Both colonial law and human rights can be understood as serving a constitutionalising function aimed at stabilising and facilitating connectivity. This allows for an understanding of colonialism and contemporary global governance as functional, but not as normative, equivalents.",
author = "Kj{\ae}r, {Poul F.}",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; Luhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society : A 2-day workshop on how Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory has influenced new developments of law in world society ; Conference date: 26-07-2018 Through 27-07-2018",
year = "2018",
language = "English",

}

Kjær, PF 2018, 'Beyond Luhmann: The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity' Paper fremlagt ved Luhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society , Oñati, Spanien, 26/07/2018 - 27/07/2018, .

Beyond Luhmann : The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity. / Kjær, Poul F.

2018. Afhandling præsenteret på Luhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society , Oñati, Spanien.

Publikation: Bidrag til konferencePaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Beyond Luhmann

T2 - The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity

AU - Kjær,Poul F.

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In an overall manner, this paper advances the argument that systems theory can benefit from two epistemological moves. First: A move away from a focus on differentiation to a focus on connectivity, i.e. a move from an intra-systemic to an inter-systemic perspective. Second: A related move towards a multi-level theory of society emphasizing vertical relations between local, national and transnational processes complementing the systems theory focus on horizontal relations between function systems. This double move, furthermore provide the basis for an understanding of global law as inter-legality. Concretely, global law settings are characterised by a structural pre-eminence of connectivity norms, a type of norm which differs from coherency or possibility norms. The centrality of connectivity norms emerges from the function of global law, which is to increase the probability of transfers of condensed social components, such as economic capital and products, religious doctrines and scientific knowledge, from one legally structured context to another within world society. This was the case from colonialism and colonial law to contemporary global supply chains and human rights. Both colonial law and human rights can be understood as serving a constitutionalising function aimed at stabilising and facilitating connectivity. This allows for an understanding of colonialism and contemporary global governance as functional, but not as normative, equivalents.

AB - In an overall manner, this paper advances the argument that systems theory can benefit from two epistemological moves. First: A move away from a focus on differentiation to a focus on connectivity, i.e. a move from an intra-systemic to an inter-systemic perspective. Second: A related move towards a multi-level theory of society emphasizing vertical relations between local, national and transnational processes complementing the systems theory focus on horizontal relations between function systems. This double move, furthermore provide the basis for an understanding of global law as inter-legality. Concretely, global law settings are characterised by a structural pre-eminence of connectivity norms, a type of norm which differs from coherency or possibility norms. The centrality of connectivity norms emerges from the function of global law, which is to increase the probability of transfers of condensed social components, such as economic capital and products, religious doctrines and scientific knowledge, from one legally structured context to another within world society. This was the case from colonialism and colonial law to contemporary global supply chains and human rights. Both colonial law and human rights can be understood as serving a constitutionalising function aimed at stabilising and facilitating connectivity. This allows for an understanding of colonialism and contemporary global governance as functional, but not as normative, equivalents.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Kjær PF. Beyond Luhmann: The Constitutionalisation of Connectivity. 2018. Afhandling præsenteret på Luhmann 20 Years After - Constructing Law in World Society , Oñati, Spanien.