Assessing the Legitimacy of “Open” and “Closed” Data Partnerships for Sustainable Development

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

114 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

This article examines the legitimacy attached to different types of multi-stakeholder data partnerships occurring in the context of sustainable development. We develop a framework to assess the democratic legitimacy of two types of data partnerships: open data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly freely available) and closed data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly shared within a network of organizations). Our framework specifies criteria for assessing the legitimacy of relevant partnerships with regard to their input legitimacy as well as their output legitimacy. We demonstrate which particular characteristics of open and closed partnerships can be expected to influence an analysis of their input and output legitimacy.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBusiness & Society
Antal sider35
ISSN0007-6503
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 6 feb. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Epub ahead of print. Published online:February 6, 2019.

Emneord

  • Big data
  • Input and output legitimacy
  • Partnerships
  • Public-private
  • Sustainable development

Citer dette

@article{9d0e30259e43410e97a6862524a788e1,
title = "Assessing the Legitimacy of “Open” and “Closed” Data Partnerships for Sustainable Development",
abstract = "This article examines the legitimacy attached to different types of multi-stakeholder data partnerships occurring in the context of sustainable development. We develop a framework to assess the democratic legitimacy of two types of data partnerships: open data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly freely available) and closed data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly shared within a network of organizations). Our framework specifies criteria for assessing the legitimacy of relevant partnerships with regard to their input legitimacy as well as their output legitimacy. We demonstrate which particular characteristics of open and closed partnerships can be expected to influence an analysis of their input and output legitimacy.",
keywords = "Big data, Input and output legitimacy, Partnerships, Public-private, Sustainable development, Big data, Input and output legitimacy, Partnerships, Public-private, Sustainable development",
author = "Andreas Rasche and Mette Morsing and Erik Wetter",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online:February 6, 2019.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0007650319825876",
language = "English",
journal = "Business & Society",
issn = "0007-6503",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",

}

Assessing the Legitimacy of “Open” and “Closed” Data Partnerships for Sustainable Development. / Rasche, Andreas; Morsing, Mette; Wetter, Erik.

I: Business & Society, 06.02.2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the Legitimacy of “Open” and “Closed” Data Partnerships for Sustainable Development

AU - Rasche, Andreas

AU - Morsing, Mette

AU - Wetter, Erik

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online:February 6, 2019.

PY - 2019/2/6

Y1 - 2019/2/6

N2 - This article examines the legitimacy attached to different types of multi-stakeholder data partnerships occurring in the context of sustainable development. We develop a framework to assess the democratic legitimacy of two types of data partnerships: open data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly freely available) and closed data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly shared within a network of organizations). Our framework specifies criteria for assessing the legitimacy of relevant partnerships with regard to their input legitimacy as well as their output legitimacy. We demonstrate which particular characteristics of open and closed partnerships can be expected to influence an analysis of their input and output legitimacy.

AB - This article examines the legitimacy attached to different types of multi-stakeholder data partnerships occurring in the context of sustainable development. We develop a framework to assess the democratic legitimacy of two types of data partnerships: open data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly freely available) and closed data partnerships (where data and insights are mainly shared within a network of organizations). Our framework specifies criteria for assessing the legitimacy of relevant partnerships with regard to their input legitimacy as well as their output legitimacy. We demonstrate which particular characteristics of open and closed partnerships can be expected to influence an analysis of their input and output legitimacy.

KW - Big data

KW - Input and output legitimacy

KW - Partnerships

KW - Public-private

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Big data

KW - Input and output legitimacy

KW - Partnerships

KW - Public-private

KW - Sustainable development

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921337077&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0007650319825876

DO - 10.1177/0007650319825876

M3 - Journal article

JO - Business & Society

JF - Business & Society

SN - 0007-6503

ER -