Arkitektur og politik: Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk

Lydia Jørgensen, Christian Borch

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

103 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Artiklen fokuserer på en atmosfærisk forståelse af relationen mellem arkitektur og politik. I artikel diskuteres, hvordan de tyske filosoffer Gernot Böhme og Peter Sloterdijk på hver deres måde sigter på at begribe arkitekturen, som de hverdagslige forsøg på at regulere adfærd gennem arkitektoniske virkemidler. Arkitektur ses dermed ikke som en politisk markør, men som et politisk styringsredskab, der manifesterer sig i hverdagens affektive erfaringer. Samtidig åbner begge perspektiver for atmosfære-blikkets kritiske potentiale.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPolitik
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)7-21
Antal sider15
ISSN1604-0058
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Emneord

  • Arkitektur
  • Politik
  • Böhme
  • Sloterdijk
  • Politisk styringsredskab

Citer dette

@article{40254fc98ca4493d919d0dc1f4f0eb91,
title = "Arkitektur og politik: Atmosf{\ae}riske refleksioner ud fra B{\"o}hme og Sloterdijk",
abstract = "The notion of atmosphere occupies an increasingly central role in present-day discussions of design, affect, architecture and sensory environments. It is mobilized in particular to emphasize and shed light on a pre-subjective, embodied apprehension of spatially discharged moods. This article especially focuses on how the notion of atmosphere offers new ways of understanding the relations between architecture and politics. Specifically, we explore such relations via the philosophical reflections on atmosphere as found in Gernot Böhme’s and Peter Sloterdijk’s work. We suggest that, in spite of significant difference between Böhme and Sloterdijk, they each offers important insights into how architecture and politics are entangled. After a brief outline of each of their general atmospheric projects, we demonstrate the different critical potential their analyses of architecture and the politics of space entail.",
keywords = "Arkitektur, Politik, B{\"o}hme, Sloterdijk, Politisk styringsredskab",
author = "Lydia J{\o}rgensen and Christian Borch",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.7146/politik.v21i2.111409",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "7--21",
journal = "Politik",
issn = "1604-0058",
publisher = "Dj{\o}f Forlag",
number = "2",

}

Arkitektur og politik : Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk. / Jørgensen, Lydia; Borch, Christian.

I: Politik, Bind 21, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 7-21.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arkitektur og politik

T2 - Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk

AU - Jørgensen, Lydia

AU - Borch, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The notion of atmosphere occupies an increasingly central role in present-day discussions of design, affect, architecture and sensory environments. It is mobilized in particular to emphasize and shed light on a pre-subjective, embodied apprehension of spatially discharged moods. This article especially focuses on how the notion of atmosphere offers new ways of understanding the relations between architecture and politics. Specifically, we explore such relations via the philosophical reflections on atmosphere as found in Gernot Böhme’s and Peter Sloterdijk’s work. We suggest that, in spite of significant difference between Böhme and Sloterdijk, they each offers important insights into how architecture and politics are entangled. After a brief outline of each of their general atmospheric projects, we demonstrate the different critical potential their analyses of architecture and the politics of space entail.

AB - The notion of atmosphere occupies an increasingly central role in present-day discussions of design, affect, architecture and sensory environments. It is mobilized in particular to emphasize and shed light on a pre-subjective, embodied apprehension of spatially discharged moods. This article especially focuses on how the notion of atmosphere offers new ways of understanding the relations between architecture and politics. Specifically, we explore such relations via the philosophical reflections on atmosphere as found in Gernot Böhme’s and Peter Sloterdijk’s work. We suggest that, in spite of significant difference between Böhme and Sloterdijk, they each offers important insights into how architecture and politics are entangled. After a brief outline of each of their general atmospheric projects, we demonstrate the different critical potential their analyses of architecture and the politics of space entail.

KW - Arkitektur

KW - Politik

KW - Böhme

KW - Sloterdijk

KW - Politisk styringsredskab

U2 - 10.7146/politik.v21i2.111409

DO - 10.7146/politik.v21i2.111409

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 7

EP - 21

JO - Politik

JF - Politik

SN - 1604-0058

IS - 2

ER -