Are Employee Selection and Incentive Contracts Complements or Substitutes?

Margaret A. Abernethy, Henri Dekker, Axel K-D. Schulz

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


There is a debate in the literature as to whether employee selection is a substitute or complement to incentive contracting. We argue that incentive contracts and selection can be both complements and substitutes conditional on the contracting difficulty faced by the firm. We examine these control choices in a setting where contracting difficulties arise due to the firm's choice of strategy and from the volatility created by the firm's external environment. We select a firm's commitment to organizational learning (OL) as our strategic choice variable as this provides a useful proxy for identifying settings where explicit incentive contracting is difficult. The results show that, as firms become increasingly committed to OL, incentive contracts and employee selection operate as complements. However, with a high commitment to OL and an increasing level of external volatility, contracting on performance measures will become less effective. In this context, our results indicate that there is a substitution effect toward employee selection.
TidsskriftJournal of Accounting Research
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)633-668
Antal sider36
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2015
Udgivet eksterntJa


  • D22
  • D23
  • D83
  • M41
  • Employee selection
  • Incentive contracting
  • Strategy
  • organizational learning
  • Volatility