An Inquiry into the Principles of Needs-based Allocation of Health Care

Tony Hope, Lars Peter Østerdal, Andreas Hasman

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The concept of need is often proposed as providing an additional or alternative criterion to cost-effectiveness in making allocation decisions in health care. If it is to be of practical value it must be sufficiently precisely characterized to be useful to decision makers. This will require both an account of how degree of need for an intervention is to be determined and a prioritization rule that clarifies how degree of need and the cost of the intervention interact in determining the relative priority of the intervention. Three common features of health care interventions must be accommodated in a comprehensive theory of need: the probabilistic nature of prognosis (with and without the intervention); the time course of effects; and the fact that the most effective treatments often combine more than one intervention. These common features are problematic for the concept of need. We outline various approaches to prioritization on the basis of need and argue that some approaches are more promising than others.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBioethics
Vol/bind24
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)470–480
ISSN0269-9702
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2010
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

Hope, Tony ; Østerdal, Lars Peter ; Hasman, Andreas. / An Inquiry into the Principles of Needs-based Allocation of Health Care. I: Bioethics. 2010 ; Bind 24, Nr. 9. s. 470–480.
@article{0157ff28192148e8809c9864a4a0cb55,
title = "An Inquiry into the Principles of Needs-based Allocation of Health Care",
abstract = "The concept of need is often proposed as providing an additional or alternative criterion to cost-effectiveness in making allocation decisions in health care. If it is to be of practical value it must be sufficiently precisely characterized to be useful to decision makers. This will require both an account of how degree of need for an intervention is to be determined and a prioritization rule that clarifies how degree of need and the cost of the intervention interact in determining the relative priority of the intervention. Three common features of health care interventions must be accommodated in a comprehensive theory of need: the probabilistic nature of prognosis (with and without the intervention); the time course of effects; and the fact that the most effective treatments often combine more than one intervention. These common features are problematic for the concept of need. We outline various approaches to prioritization on the basis of need and argue that some approaches are more promising than others.",
author = "Tony Hope and {\O}sterdal, {Lars Peter} and Andreas Hasman",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01734.x",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "470–480",
journal = "Bioethics",
issn = "0269-9702",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "9",

}

An Inquiry into the Principles of Needs-based Allocation of Health Care. / Hope, Tony; Østerdal, Lars Peter; Hasman, Andreas.

I: Bioethics, Bind 24, Nr. 9, 2010, s. 470–480.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Inquiry into the Principles of Needs-based Allocation of Health Care

AU - Hope, Tony

AU - Østerdal, Lars Peter

AU - Hasman, Andreas

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The concept of need is often proposed as providing an additional or alternative criterion to cost-effectiveness in making allocation decisions in health care. If it is to be of practical value it must be sufficiently precisely characterized to be useful to decision makers. This will require both an account of how degree of need for an intervention is to be determined and a prioritization rule that clarifies how degree of need and the cost of the intervention interact in determining the relative priority of the intervention. Three common features of health care interventions must be accommodated in a comprehensive theory of need: the probabilistic nature of prognosis (with and without the intervention); the time course of effects; and the fact that the most effective treatments often combine more than one intervention. These common features are problematic for the concept of need. We outline various approaches to prioritization on the basis of need and argue that some approaches are more promising than others.

AB - The concept of need is often proposed as providing an additional or alternative criterion to cost-effectiveness in making allocation decisions in health care. If it is to be of practical value it must be sufficiently precisely characterized to be useful to decision makers. This will require both an account of how degree of need for an intervention is to be determined and a prioritization rule that clarifies how degree of need and the cost of the intervention interact in determining the relative priority of the intervention. Three common features of health care interventions must be accommodated in a comprehensive theory of need: the probabilistic nature of prognosis (with and without the intervention); the time course of effects; and the fact that the most effective treatments often combine more than one intervention. These common features are problematic for the concept of need. We outline various approaches to prioritization on the basis of need and argue that some approaches are more promising than others.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925502177&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01734.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01734.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 470

EP - 480

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

IS - 9

ER -