Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts

The Role of Informal Institutions

Jacobo Ramirez, Claudia Vélez-Zapata, Sergio Madero

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

91 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.

Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.

Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.

Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftManagement Research: the journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)197-218
Antal sider22
ISSN1536-5433
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 28 mar. 2018

Bibliografisk note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 28 March 2018

Emneord

  • Mexico
  • Colombia
  • Ambidexterity
  • Informal institutions
  • Non-governmental armed groups
  • Illegitimate institutions

Citer dette

@article{e3e6fe07b9464742b091c17d1666a13e,
title = "Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts: The Role of Informal Institutions",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.",
keywords = "Mexico, Colombia, Ambidexterity, Informal institutions, Non-governmental armed groups, Illegitimate institutions, Mexico, Colombia, Ambidexterity, Informal institutions, Illegitimate institutions, Non-governmental armed groups",
author = "Jacobo Ramirez and Claudia V{\'e}lez-Zapata and Sergio Madero",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 28. March 2018",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2018-0811",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "197--218",
journal = "Management Research",
issn = "1536-5433",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "2",

}

Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts : The Role of Informal Institutions. / Ramirez, Jacobo; Vélez-Zapata, Claudia; Madero, Sergio.

I: Management Research: the journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Bind 16, Nr. 2, 28.03.2018, s. 197-218.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts

T2 - The Role of Informal Institutions

AU - Ramirez, Jacobo

AU - Vélez-Zapata, Claudia

AU - Madero, Sergio

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 28. March 2018

PY - 2018/3/28

Y1 - 2018/3/28

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.

KW - Mexico

KW - Colombia

KW - Ambidexterity

KW - Informal institutions

KW - Non-governmental armed groups

KW - Illegitimate institutions

KW - Mexico

KW - Colombia

KW - Ambidexterity

KW - Informal institutions

KW - Illegitimate institutions

KW - Non-governmental armed groups

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=991042727094786&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2018-0811

DO - 10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2018-0811

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 197

EP - 218

JO - Management Research

JF - Management Research

SN - 1536-5433

IS - 2

ER -