A Unifying Framework for the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims

Jens Leth Hougaard, Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, Lars Peter Østerdal

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In a recent paper, Thomson and Yeh [Thomson, W., Yeh, C.-H., 2008. Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Journal of Economic Theory 143, 177–198] introduced the concept of operators on the space of rules for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. They focused on three operators in order to uncover the structure of such a space. In this paper, we generalize their analysis upon presenting and studying a general family of operators inspired by three apparently unrelated approaches to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. We study the structural properties of this family and show, in particular, that most of Thomson and Yeh’s results are specific cases of our study.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Mathematical Economics
Vol/bind48
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)107–114
ISSN0304-4068
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Rationing
  • Operators
  • Baselines
  • Composition
  • Claims

Citer dette

Hougaard, Jens Leth ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. ; Østerdal, Lars Peter. / A Unifying Framework for the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims. I: Journal of Mathematical Economics. 2012 ; Bind 48, Nr. 2. s. 107–114.
@article{80cb9e006ce84e81b18da21d0447d7b5,
title = "A Unifying Framework for the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims",
abstract = "In a recent paper, Thomson and Yeh [Thomson, W., Yeh, C.-H., 2008. Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Journal of Economic Theory 143, 177–198] introduced the concept of operators on the space of rules for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. They focused on three operators in order to uncover the structure of such a space. In this paper, we generalize their analysis upon presenting and studying a general family of operators inspired by three apparently unrelated approaches to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. We study the structural properties of this family and show, in particular, that most of Thomson and Yeh’s results are specific cases of our study.",
keywords = "Rationing, Operators, Baselines, Composition, Claims, Rationing, Operators, Baselines, Composition, Claims",
author = "Hougaard, {Jens Leth} and Moreno-Ternero, {Juan D.} and {\O}sterdal, {Lars Peter}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "107–114",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Economics",
issn = "0304-4068",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

A Unifying Framework for the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims. / Hougaard, Jens Leth; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.; Østerdal, Lars Peter.

I: Journal of Mathematical Economics, Bind 48, Nr. 2, 2012, s. 107–114.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Unifying Framework for the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims

AU - Hougaard, Jens Leth

AU - Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.

AU - Østerdal, Lars Peter

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In a recent paper, Thomson and Yeh [Thomson, W., Yeh, C.-H., 2008. Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Journal of Economic Theory 143, 177–198] introduced the concept of operators on the space of rules for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. They focused on three operators in order to uncover the structure of such a space. In this paper, we generalize their analysis upon presenting and studying a general family of operators inspired by three apparently unrelated approaches to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. We study the structural properties of this family and show, in particular, that most of Thomson and Yeh’s results are specific cases of our study.

AB - In a recent paper, Thomson and Yeh [Thomson, W., Yeh, C.-H., 2008. Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims. Journal of Economic Theory 143, 177–198] introduced the concept of operators on the space of rules for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. They focused on three operators in order to uncover the structure of such a space. In this paper, we generalize their analysis upon presenting and studying a general family of operators inspired by three apparently unrelated approaches to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. We study the structural properties of this family and show, in particular, that most of Thomson and Yeh’s results are specific cases of our study.

KW - Rationing

KW - Operators

KW - Baselines

KW - Composition

KW - Claims

KW - Rationing

KW - Operators

KW - Baselines

KW - Composition

KW - Claims

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921387915&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.01.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 107

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Mathematical Economics

JF - Journal of Mathematical Economics

SN - 0304-4068

IS - 2

ER -