A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains

Mark Dallas, Stefano Ponte, Timothy Sturgeon

Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

Resumé

‘Power’ has been a foundational concept in examining global value chains and production networks for understanding patterns and dynamics in the global political economy. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years given the proliferation of new GVC frameworks, which extend beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages, to incorporate other stakeholders and mechanisms – including NGOs, labor unions, standards and conventions. In this paper, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVCs. We delineate two principal dimensions of power: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power exercised in GVCs: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.
‘Power’ has been a foundational concept in examining global value chains and production networks for understanding patterns and dynamics in the global political economy. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years given the proliferation of new GVC frameworks, which extend beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages, to incorporate other stakeholders and mechanisms – including NGOs, labor unions, standards and conventions. In this paper, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVCs. We delineate two principal dimensions of power: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power exercised in GVCs: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.
SprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedFrederiksberg
UdgiverCopenhagen Business School [wp]
Antal sider37
ISBN (Elektronisk)9788793571006
StatusUdgivet - 2017
NavnWorking Paper in Business and Politics
Nummer92

Citer dette

Dallas, M., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. (2017). A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School [wp]. Working Paper in Business and Politics, Nr. 92
Dallas, Mark ; Ponte, Stefano ; Sturgeon, Timothy. / A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains. Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School [wp], 2017. (Working Paper in Business and Politics; Nr. 92).
@techreport{88c6e12b5b554e88bb9730b08ba245b6,
title = "A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains",
abstract = "‘Power’ has been a foundational concept in examining global value chains and production networks for understanding patterns and dynamics in the global political economy. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years given the proliferation of new GVC frameworks, which extend beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages, to incorporate other stakeholders and mechanisms – including NGOs, labor unions, standards and conventions. In this paper, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVCs. We delineate two principal dimensions of power: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power exercised in GVCs: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.",
author = "Mark Dallas and Stefano Ponte and Timothy Sturgeon",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
publisher = "Copenhagen Business School [wp]",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Copenhagen Business School [wp]",

}

Dallas, M, Ponte, S & Sturgeon, T 2017 'A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains' Copenhagen Business School [wp], Frederiksberg.

A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains. / Dallas, Mark; Ponte, Stefano; Sturgeon, Timothy.

Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School [wp], 2017.

Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

TY - UNPB

T1 - A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains

AU - Dallas,Mark

AU - Ponte,Stefano

AU - Sturgeon,Timothy

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - ‘Power’ has been a foundational concept in examining global value chains and production networks for understanding patterns and dynamics in the global political economy. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years given the proliferation of new GVC frameworks, which extend beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages, to incorporate other stakeholders and mechanisms – including NGOs, labor unions, standards and conventions. In this paper, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVCs. We delineate two principal dimensions of power: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power exercised in GVCs: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.

AB - ‘Power’ has been a foundational concept in examining global value chains and production networks for understanding patterns and dynamics in the global political economy. Yet, in most GVC scholarship, power is not explicitly defined and is applied as a unitary concept, rather than as having multiple dimensions. Clarifying the concept of power has become particularly urgent in recent years given the proliferation of new GVC frameworks, which extend beyond dyads of transacting firms or firm-state linkages, to incorporate other stakeholders and mechanisms – including NGOs, labor unions, standards and conventions. In this paper, we propose a typology for the varied meanings and usages of power in GVCs. We delineate two principal dimensions of power: transmission mechanisms – direct and diffuse; and arena of actors – dyads and collectives. Combined, these two dimensions yield four ideal types of power exercised in GVCs: bargaining, demonstrative, institutional and constitutive. We offer brief illustrations of these four types of power and provide an agenda for further research in the field.

M3 - Working paper

BT - A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains

PB - Copenhagen Business School [wp]

CY - Frederiksberg

ER -

Dallas M, Ponte S, Sturgeon T. A Typology of Power in Global Value Chains. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School [wp]. 2017.