A Trade-based Analysis of Momentum

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article uses transactions data for all NYSE/AMEX stocks in the period 1983-2002 to study how investors trade in Jegadeesh and Titman's (1993) momentum portfolios. Among small trades, there is an extremely sluggish reaction to the past returns. For instance, an initial small-trade buying pressure exists for loser stocks, and it gradually converts into an intense selling pressure over the following year. The results are consistent with initial underreaction followed by delayed reaction among small traders. Moreover, small-trade imbalances during the formation period significantly affect momentum returns, suggesting that underreaction among small traders contributes to the momentum effect. Large traders, by contrast, show no evidence of underreaction, and large-trade imbalances have little impact on subsequent returns. Overall, the results suggest that momentum could partly be driven by the behavior of small traders.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftReview of Financial Studies
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)457-491
Antal sider35
ISSN0893-9454
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2006
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{81ac2038b8384638872853167e86c413,
title = "A Trade-based Analysis of Momentum",
abstract = "This article uses transactions data for all NYSE/AMEX stocks in the period 1983-2002 to study how investors trade in Jegadeesh and Titman's (1993) momentum portfolios. Among small trades, there is an extremely sluggish reaction to the past returns. For instance, an initial small-trade buying pressure exists for loser stocks, and it gradually converts into an intense selling pressure over the following year. The results are consistent with initial underreaction followed by delayed reaction among small traders. Moreover, small-trade imbalances during the formation period significantly affect momentum returns, suggesting that underreaction among small traders contributes to the momentum effect. Large traders, by contrast, show no evidence of underreaction, and large-trade imbalances have little impact on subsequent returns. Overall, the results suggest that momentum could partly be driven by the behavior of small traders.",
author = "S{\o}ren Hvidkj{\ae}r",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/rfs/hhj016",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "457--491",
journal = "Review of Financial Studies",
issn = "0893-9454",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

A Trade-based Analysis of Momentum. / Hvidkjær, Søren.

I: Review of Financial Studies, Bind 19, Nr. 2, 06.2006, s. 457-491.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Trade-based Analysis of Momentum

AU - Hvidkjær, Søren

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - This article uses transactions data for all NYSE/AMEX stocks in the period 1983-2002 to study how investors trade in Jegadeesh and Titman's (1993) momentum portfolios. Among small trades, there is an extremely sluggish reaction to the past returns. For instance, an initial small-trade buying pressure exists for loser stocks, and it gradually converts into an intense selling pressure over the following year. The results are consistent with initial underreaction followed by delayed reaction among small traders. Moreover, small-trade imbalances during the formation period significantly affect momentum returns, suggesting that underreaction among small traders contributes to the momentum effect. Large traders, by contrast, show no evidence of underreaction, and large-trade imbalances have little impact on subsequent returns. Overall, the results suggest that momentum could partly be driven by the behavior of small traders.

AB - This article uses transactions data for all NYSE/AMEX stocks in the period 1983-2002 to study how investors trade in Jegadeesh and Titman's (1993) momentum portfolios. Among small trades, there is an extremely sluggish reaction to the past returns. For instance, an initial small-trade buying pressure exists for loser stocks, and it gradually converts into an intense selling pressure over the following year. The results are consistent with initial underreaction followed by delayed reaction among small traders. Moreover, small-trade imbalances during the formation period significantly affect momentum returns, suggesting that underreaction among small traders contributes to the momentum effect. Large traders, by contrast, show no evidence of underreaction, and large-trade imbalances have little impact on subsequent returns. Overall, the results suggest that momentum could partly be driven by the behavior of small traders.

U2 - 10.1093/rfs/hhj016

DO - 10.1093/rfs/hhj016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 457

EP - 491

JO - Review of Financial Studies

JF - Review of Financial Studies

SN - 0893-9454

IS - 2

ER -